ShareThis Page
House vs. Obama I |

House vs. Obama I

| Saturday, August 9, 2014 9:00 p.m

The caption under the picture that accompanied the front-page print version of the news story “House’s vote to sue Obama is historic foray into checks, balances” said it was of President Obama “Addressing Republicans on Wednesday in a speech in Kansas City, Mo., where audience members rushed up to take photos afterward.”

If Obama took his feet off the Oval Office desk, actually got up and really “addressed Republicans” rather than calling them names, maybe we’d all be better off. He wants to negotiate with our real enemies around the world but fails to recognize that his opponents are as much American as his supporters.

And, Mr. President, on your way to the Republican chambers, leave your “my way or the highway” attitude behind. That would be a refreshing “change” that we can still “hope” for.

M.S. Janosov Jr.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.