HS highlight reel: WPIAL again rules Lincoln Park guard ineligible until Jan. 21 |

HS highlight reel: WPIAL again rules Lincoln Park guard ineligible until Jan. 21

After a second WPIAL hearing, Lincoln Park junior Nick Aloi remains ineligible to play basketball until Jan. 21.

School administrators and Aloi’s family presented additional testimony Monday in an attempt to overturn an April decision by the WPIAL Board of Directors. Instead, the board voted unanimously to uphold its earlier decision, executive director Tim O’Malley said.

Aloi transferred last January from Ellwood City, a move the WPIAL decided was motivated at least partially by athletics. For a second time, Lincoln Park will appeal to the PIAA, athletic director Mike Bariski said, who anticipated a Dec. 11 hearing.

Much of the new testimony involved Aloi’s grandfather, Frank Aloi Sr., who retired in June as Ellwood City’s superintendent.

Ellwood City administrators said he was critical of former basketball coach Anthony Ovial. But Aloi’s family disagreed and insisted he didn’t influence his grandson’s transfer.

— Chris Harlan

Stats of the day


Yards per carry in three playoff games for Aliquippa RB Kaezon Pugh, who has run for 679 yards and 12 TDs


Yards South Fayette QB Brett Brumbaugh needs to tie the state record for career passing (10,948).

FC coach withdraws name

Ford City football coach John Bartolovic has withdrawn his name from consideration for the same position at Armstrong High School, which begins play in fall 2015. Bartolovic spent 19 seasons at Ford City and led the team to three WPIAL semifinal appearances after previously coaching at Shannock Valley.

— Matt Grubba

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.