ShareThis Page
Humankind’s ‘progress’ |

Humankind’s ‘progress’

| Monday, December 8, 2008 12:00 a.m

I greatly enjoyed Dimitri Vassilaros’ column ” Shop till you drop ” (Nov. 28 and, which suggested that “wanting more” encourages “progress.”

Yes, but …

Apparently, for about 6 million years, mankind was confined to a relatively small area (northeastern Africa) of planet Earth. About 50,000 years ago, mankind seems to have wandered to other areas — mostly to places that are colder. Mankind was able to survive these colder, less-hospitable climates by being clever — it would seem.

Currently mankind is planning, by again being clever, to wander out from Earth to the Moon, Mars and beyond — mostly to places that are even more cold and even less hospitable.

But is this march into the cold and the inhospitable “progress?” Has “wanting more” duped mankind into a colder, less-hospitable future• Are humans bright or are humans just naturally not very bright after all — at least in terms of the overall scheme of nature and the universe?

Dennis Bogdan

Baldwin Borough

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.