ShareThis Page
Humble jockey’s thoughts with Barbaro |

Humble jockey’s thoughts with Barbaro

The Associated Press
| Friday, May 26, 2006 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK — Edgar Prado was back at work, riding in a $32,000 claiming race that was a long way from the Preakness.

He finished seventh aboard Mighty Good in the second race Thursday at Belmont Park. But his thoughts were still with Barbaro, the Kentucky Derby winner who is on the road to recovery after a horrific breakdown.

“I’m a human being, you know• I have feelings,” a somber Prado said yesterday, nearly a week after he pulled up Barbaro when the colt suffered catastrophic injuries to his right hind leg. “Even the toughest men cry, right?”

Prado, one of the nation’s leading riders, returned to work at Belmont one day after the Preakness. He has been praised for reacting quickly to bring Barbaro to a halt and likely saving his life. The jockey insists the horse deserves credit, too.

“I think he figured out right away something was wrong,” Prado said. “Instead of fighting me, he tried to help himself, too. It was a combination of both of us. He’s very athletic. He was like telling me, ‘Come on, help me out here.’ ”

Seconds earlier, Barbaro was so eager to run, he broke out of the starting gate early. Prado then led the colt back around the gate to be reloaded. But just as the crowd began roaring, many believing Barbaro would not only win the Preakness but go on to take the Triple Crown three weeks later in the Belmont Stakes, the powerful colt took a bad step.

“He pulled up like a typical horse, but he didn’t go crazy,” Prado said. “He didn’t try to throw himself on the ground. He stood up until I jumped off. … About three or four strides, he had the leg in the air. That was very smart.”

With the crowd stunned and the rest of the field racing around Pimlico, Prado thought for an instant Barbaro might not survive. When a blue curtain was raised to keep Barbaro out of view from the thousands of fans nearby, Prado said, “It crossed my mind. But I knew this particular horse, and that the owners (Gretchen and Roy Jackson) would give him every chance possible to live.”

Prado has not seen Barbaro since the colt was loaded into an ambulance last Saturday night and taken to the George D. Widener Hospital for Large Animals at New Bolton Center in Kennett Square. The hospital is less than five miles from the Jacksons’ farm in West Grove, and trainer Michael Matz also lives nearby in Coatesville. The jockey hopes to find time to make a call on Barbaro soon.

“When you are attached to a horse who has brought you so much joy only a few weeks ago, and put you in the spotlight and makes your dreams come true, it definitely breaks your heart,” Prado said of his first Derby winner. “A lot of people, not only me, said this horse could have been a Triple Crown horse.”

Prado saw replays of the race for the first time Monday, and he remains convinced Barbaro’s early break from the gate had no bearing on the life-threatening injuries. Until then, he just couldn’t bring himself to watch.

“I don’t think it was anything, just bad racing luck,” he said. “He broke clean. He broke better than the Derby. … It was just bad luck.”

At a news conference this week, Roy Jackson thanked everyone who helped give Barbaro a chance to survive. He started with Prado “for the job he did pulling up the horse.”

Prado believes Barbaro’s injury occurred “50 to 75 yards” after he left the gate.

“He told me that he just came down the wrong way on the leg and it was just one of those things that happens in racing,” Jackson said.

Earlier this year, Prado’s mother died.

“That was the worst day of my life,” he said. “Saturday was the toughest day of my career. It was love at first sight with Barbaro. We both got along pretty good, and he’s a special horse.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.