ShareThis Page
Hundreds of empty heroin stamp bags found in car after high-speed chase |

Hundreds of empty heroin stamp bags found in car after high-speed chase

Tony Raap
| Wednesday, August 19, 2015 2:51 p.m

Police in Beaver County found hundreds of empty heroin stamp bags in a Lawrence County man’s car after a high-speed chase that forced at least 10 cars off the road.

Michael Joseph Hancock, 35, of New Castle is charged with fleeing or attempting to elude an officer, driving under the influence, possession of drug paraphernalia and other counts.

The chase began about 5:30 p.m. Monday when state police noticed a car speeding on Interstate 376 near Exit 31, according to a criminal complaint.

Hancock blew out a tire when he hit a guardrail while crossing Route 51, but he kept driving.

The pursuit wove through side streets and up a hill. Between 10 and 12 cars left the road to avoid a collision during the chase, according to the complaint.

Hancock got out of his car and ran when he reached the train tracks in Beaver Falls, about four miles from where the pursuit began. Police arrested him a short time later.

They found hundreds of empty, unmarked stamp bags, four hypodermic needles, a small amount of marijuana, a digital scale and a burnt spoon in his car, according to the complaint.

Hancock posted a $10,000 bond. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Aug. 28. Court records do not list an attorney for him.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.