ShareThis Page
Hundreds protest mental health facility in Baldwin Township |

Hundreds protest mental health facility in Baldwin Township

| Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:00 a.m

Baldwin Township commissioners Monday night delayed a decision on whether to allow a mental health facility on Newport Drive.

About 200 people showed up at the Castle Shannon Fire Hall to oppose Mercy Behavioral Health’s proposal for the former Rolling Hills Manor site. They left the questioning to attorney John Arminas, who said he was hired by several of the residents who live adjacent to the property.

Arminas, along with township solicitor Thomas McDermott, questioned Mercy officials on the safety of the facility and how it will be used. Mercy plans a long-term structured residence for 32 people there, “which is the same as a nursing home,” said the company’s lawyer, Arnold Horovitz.

But Arminas said it does not qualify as a nursing home under the state Public Welfare Code. That defines a nursing home as a place that cares for residents who are not “acutely ill,” Arminas said. The Mercy facility will offer an extended acute-care program.

“It sounds more like a prison, not a nursing home to me,” Arminas said.

The facility will have secured doors and windows and an outdoor recreational area enclosed by a 6-foot fence, said architect Frank Golba.

Arminas questioned whether a facility with locked doors and cameras monitoring the entryways is safe.

“I believe it is,” said Peggy Kearney, a licensed clinical social worker with Mercy. “The community is not endangered from the residents we serve.”

Mary Jeanne Serafin, CEO at Mayview State Hospital, said all residents would either have a mental illness or severe psychiatric disability who require 24-hour care in a facility that can be locked.

After more than four hours and with only three of the 12 planned Mercy representatives having the opportunity to speak, the commissioners delayed a preliminary vote. A second hearing will be scheduled within the next 45 days.

McDermott reassured the few people who stayed until the end of the meeting all would have a chance to comment.

“We’re not giving up. We can’t give up,” said opponent Eileen Hoellein. “Nobody wants this here. If we give up, we’ll have to move.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.