Archive

ShareThis Page
Hunt on for killer in NYC subway shoving death | TribLIVE.com
News

Hunt on for killer in NYC subway shoving death

The Associated Press
| Monday, November 17, 2014 10:03 p.m.

NEW YORK — Police hunted Monday for the man who shoved a stranger off a subway platform to his death and circulated surveillance footage of the suspect walking calmly away from the station just minutes after the fatal push.

Wai Kuen Kwok, 61, was standing with his wife on the platform at the Grand Concourse and East 167th Street station in the Highbridge neighborhood of the Bronx on Sunday when he was pushed from behind. Kwok was struck by a southbound D train at about 8:40 a.m. and pronounced dead at the scene. His wife was not injured.

There was no indication that Kwok knew the man or had any interaction with him before he was pushed, police said. His wife said she did not recognize the man. The killer fled the station and, police said, hopped on a city bus two minutes later with others who had been on the platform at the time of the push and unknowingly discussed the incident with the man nearby.

Surveillance footage shows the suspect walking calmly from the subway station. Later footage shows him getting off a bus 10 blocks away, heading into a convenience store and emerging smoking a cigarette.

The man is balding and dressed in a leather jacket, dark pants and white sneakers. Police are trying to determine his whereabouts.

The victim’s wife, 59, was taken to a hospital for observation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.