ShareThis Page
IBM to Pittsburgh: Use data to help motorists get around |

IBM to Pittsburgh: Use data to help motorists get around

| Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:54 p.m.

Technology giant IBM on Thursday urged Western Pennsylvania government and transit agencies to turn their data into information that motorists can use to get around faster.

The company sent eight analysts to Pittsburgh last year to recommend technology-based solutions to the city’s transportation woes. Pittsburgh got an estimated $400,000 worth of free help through the company’s Smarter Cities Challenge program.

“IBM is saying, ‘Look, you guys have a lot of good data. You have a lot of good partnerships. You just have to develop applications so that data can be shared and get it out to people who are using the system,’” said Stan Caldwell, deputy executive director of Carnegie Mellon University’s Traffic 21 program and T-Set University Transportation Centers.

Entities such as PennDOT, Port Authority of Allegheny County and the city of Pittsburgh know when the Parkway West is backing up, buses are running late and streets are closed, but they need to develop a simple way to get that information to drivers, IBM said.

It suggested the city partner with transportation agencies and universities for high-tech solutions that the public could access from computers or mobile devices.

“If you’re sitting in your car or office and you can’t make a decision before you get in your car to go to Greenfield, it’s no good to you,” Caldwell said.

Patrick Roberts, Pittsburgh’s principal transportation planner, said the city is starting to follow IBM’s advice, having the University of Pittsburgh collect enormous amounts of data for CMU to analyze.

“They’re not saying, ‘You should tear down the Squirrel Hill Tunnel.’ … They’re saying, ‘You’ve got data here to make you smarter, but you’re not using it,’” Roberts said.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.He can be reached at 412-765-2312.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.