If OPEC frets, the trend must be good |

If OPEC frets, the trend must be good

Enough troubles in the world, right• So let’s turn to an economic distress story that applies not the least tug to the heart strings.

OPEC fills the bill. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries is the international oil cartel. It should be illegal but hey, these are sovereign nations. OPEC is beginning to have concerns about 2004, which means more of us should feel good about it.

Market conditions are shaping up negatively for OPEC members. Global oil prices are coming down at a worrisome — that is, wonderful — rate, 15 percent in the past month. The average barrel of crude might be $5 lower early next year.

One reason for this terrible (terrific) news is that Iraq is repairing its oil fields and increasing output again. That hasn’t been front-page news, but it ought to be. We mourn the chaos, bombs and bloodshed in Iraq. Not to mention the $87 billion bill for another year’s painful peacekeeping over there. Yet, if OPEC’s fears are founded, some of the cost will come back in lower oil prices whose cents per gallon — or billions of dollars in toto — we may never properly credit. The war was “never about oil,” remember.

Nevertheless, will the “refund” be good for the U.S. economy• No question.

OPEC held one of its periodic price-fixings this past week amidst the palaces and pastries of Vienna. Its ministers signaled they may have to meet again out of schedule in December to consider reducing supplies. That’s how the hydrocarbon mafia does it.

It sets targets, supply ceilings for each member of the gang and a price range for world markets. The early ’04 target fixing is $22 to $28 a barrel, well down from the 2003 realized average of $31 a barrel.

Should recent price weakness keep up, production quotas may need resetting. Algeria, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia or Venezuela might have to cap some wells. This would let more Iraqi crude flow to market without killing prices. The oil country kingpins’ first priority is to keep that price up. Swiss bank accounts and U.S. investments have to be fed. So far, Iraq’s partial revival hasn’t hurt (that is, helped) too much, but the trend is there.

The ancient Mesopotamia sits atop the world’s second largest petroleum pool (first is the Saudis’). Iraqi production has quietly, surprisingly risen by almost a fifth in just two weeks. That’s to an average 1.9 million barrels a day. Getting close, that is, to the 2.5 million rate that prevailed before the March invasion. And this despite sabotage, looting and power failures.

Oil wealth is one of the modern world’s most ironic blessings. The populations of undemocratic countries that have it never seem to benefit, just the potentates. And look at the saboteurs of Iraq. They can’t bear to let their own countrymen produce natural riches from the earth, because in so doing, they’ll benefit America while, of course, spurring prosperity in their own societies. Nature should have distributed common sense as lavishly as it did crude oil.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.