ShareThis Page
Illiteracy a greater problem than in past |

Illiteracy a greater problem than in past

| Thursday, October 7, 2004 12:00 a.m

Fifty-three percent of working-age adults in Los Angeles are illiterate to the extent they can’t cope with street signs, employment applications or utility bills.

These 3.8 million people are a small portion of the 48 percent of adult Americans who can’t read and write English well enough to have a shot at a good life.

We learned early that it is unwise to show any impatience with the ignorant as they blunder about lest they beat you to a bloody pulp.

This lesson was easily learned in the public schools, where large cohorts of students (excluding, of course, those who had already dropped out) would know next to nothing even as graduation approached.

But things have changed, and we do not fear the wrath of the defiantly unschooled.

Twenty-five and more years ago you could get a good-paying manufacturing job without having even graduated 12th grade. Today, drone-like, brute labor is no longer as well rewarded in the United States because free trade is ascendant, and there are other people in other places willing to do it for less money – or better.

Considering the literacy statistics (need we look further than the test scores from public schools?), mom and pop and the little ones still aren’t getting it.

The world won’t turn on a dime, so their ignorance can be of little consequence. They will be left behind and will have nobody to justly blame but themselves.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.