ShareThis Page
In PNC jet, chief roars above the peasants |

In PNC jet, chief roars above the peasants

Jet-setter Jim Rohr boarded the corporate plane and flew to Tampa.

An undisclosed number of nebulous clients accompanied him. They apparently were so anxious to close some as-yet-unannounced banking deal with the PNC chairman that they were willing to sacrifice a Sunday to do business.

That was the story offered Thursday by PNC media relations staffers and they were sticking to it. No matter how uncomfortable it likely made them to defend the recent use of a PNC jet to transport Rohr and his mystery guests to and from Super Bowl XLIII.

Dwelling in the insular stratosphere of the corporate elite, Rohr probably didn’t realize how gluttonous many high-profile CEOs appear these days — even those who don’t use company aircraft to get to a football game.

He probably missed the public outcry in November when the chief executives of the Big Three automakers flew on corporate jets from Detroit to Washington to beg Congress for a bailout.

People driving beat-up Cavaliers dotted with rust tend to get upset when the CEOs of companies that get handed their hard-earned money continue to indulge in the perks of the privileged.

PNC received $7.6 billion in federal bailout money after it agreed in October to acquire National City Corp.

PNC spokesman Fred Solomon said Rohr can’t fly commercial on his business or personal trips, even if he prefers munching Lance crackers with Southwest Airlines commoners to sipping champagne from slippers on PNC One.

(I say PNC One because the company possesses five corporate aircraft, although three of them came from National City. No wonder that bank soon will be just a memory.)

Solomon said the PNC board requires Rohr “to travel on the corporate jet for (his) security.”

Before Rohr’s trip to the Super Bowl, such a requirement was preposterous.

But after news of his private flight, which occurs a week after news of 5,800 jobs being eliminated in the merger, legitimate concerns probably exist over his continued well-being.

In addition to keeping Rohr safe and sound, Solomon said the corporate jet affords him the convenience of using airports that don’t offer commercial service.

Indulging in convenience for the Super Bowl was unnecessary, though; just ask any of the 1.4 million commercial passengers who used Tampa International Airport in December.

You would think the head of a company that received billions in bailout money would have the common sense to conduct himself with an air of austerity.

You would think a responsible CEO would have avoided this public relations blunder by using any other mode of transport than corporate aircraft — rental car, Greyhound bus, hitchhiking — to get to the Super Bowl.

In this instance, however, such thinking would be nothing more than pie in the plane-filled sky.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.