ShareThis Page
Incumbents in north races retain leadership |

Incumbents in north races retain leadership

Reid R. Frazier
| Wednesday, November 5, 2003 12:00 a.m

In Ward 1, Democratic incumbent Dan DeMarco appeared to defeat Republican challenger Eloise Peet. With three of four precincts reporting, DeMarco had 55 percent of the votes to 45 percent for Peet.

In Ward 3, Democratic incumbent Daniel Kinross defeated Republican challenger Angelo Romano. Kinross, completing his 12th year as commissioner, received 55 percent of the vote to 45 percent for Romano.

Romano said he was “a little bit surprised” by the result but would consider running again.

“The loss hasn’t soured me. I did this for the community. I felt like folks were primed for a change,” Romano said.

In Ward 5, Republican Grace Stanko appeared to best Democrat Beverly Young for the seat now held by Democrat Patrick Lawlor, who chose not to run. With two of four precincts reporting, Stanko had 64 percent of the vote to 36 percent for Young.

In Ward 7, Democratic incumbent Gerald O’Brien appeared to defeat Republican challenger Michelle Bish. With two of four precincts reporting, O’Brien received 70 percent of the vote to 30 percent for Bish.

In Ward 9, Republican incumbent Grant Montgomery appeared to defeat Democrat Georgene Gallo. With one of three precincts tallied, Montgomery garnered 60 percent of the vote to 40 percent for Gallo.

In Ward 2, results from the race between Republican incumbent William Grady and Democratic challenger Chris Eyster came in too late for this edition.


In Ward 2, incumbent Republican Carole Ford and Republican Andrew Flowers topped Democrat Paul Farkas for two available seats. Ford received 49 percent of the vote, Flowers received 35 percent, and Farkas received 16 percent. Republican incumbent Oliver Poppenberg did not seek re-election.

In Ward 3, Democrat Terry Brennan narrowly was leading Republican William Cornman for the seat vacated by incumbent Republican C.B. Hays, who did not seek re-election. Brennan received 53 percent of the vote to Cornman’s 47 percent.

Democrat Reginald Bridges ran unopposed for the 1st Ward seat now held by Republican Charles Reist, who did not seek re-election.


In Ward 7, Republican incumbent Bill Cross defeated Democratic challenger Frank Miller. Cross received 59 percent of the vote to Miller’s 41 percent.

Running unopposed were Ward 1 incumbent Democrat Ed Duss, Ward 3 incumbent Republican David Shutter and Ward 7 Republican Susan Fisher.


In Millvale, four Democratic incumbents appeared to hold off Republican challenger Ilona McPherson for four seats on the borough council. With one of five precincts counted, Don Gillespie received 26 percent of the vote, Mary Gregory Schessler received 18 percent, James Porter received 21 percent, Robert Knierim received 23 percent, and McPherson, who resurrected the Republican Party in Millvale after 37 years, received 14 percent.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.