Archive

ShareThis Page
Indiana Township submits audit | TribLIVE.com
News

Indiana Township submits audit

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, April 3, 2003 12:00 a.m

INDIANA TOWNSHIP: For the first time since 1996, the township has submitted an audit to the state done by an independent auditing firm.

The firm of Maher Duesel performed the audit and met the April 1 deadline at which municipal audits were due at the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development.

“They (Maher Duesel) did a very through job,” Township Manager Daniel Anderson said.

Anderson reported to the township supervisors on the audit and said there were no major findings.

Some of the recommendations centered on the utilities funds. Theadministrative service costs were divided up by area. For example, OttawaHills was charged office fees separate from the other sewer districts. Theindependent auditors informed the township all the administrative feescould be lumped together.

The 2002 audit notes the value of fixed assets, such as the worth of thesewers and other utilities, was not documented. Anderson went looking forthe records, however he found the same comment in the 1996 audit.

“The township’s been aware of this for some time,” Anderson said.

He doesn’t foresee a problem. However, if Middle Road residents getsewers, as is being researched, Anderson will make sure all records arekept on the costs and depreciation of these assets.

“If we do the project, we will follow the procedures outlined by MaherDuesel and retain those records,” he said.

The procedures for determining fixed assets “was not an item raised in anyof the audits between (1996) and now,” Anderson said.

Those audits were performed by the township’s elected auditors.

The elected auditors — David Allison, Charles Wolenter and Michael Churilla — questioned hiring the outside firm. Anderson said, asa home rule township, Indiana has that option. However, if a firm is hired,the elected officers are not to conduct an audit. Also, the township isnot permitted to pay them the salary of about $3,00 they normally receive for their work.

“I felt more comfortable having an independent audit because of thecircumstances,” Anderson said.

The 2003 budget was the first organized by Anderson who took over theposition in September 2002 after the death of Kevin Brozek. Thesupervisors approved hiring Maher Duesel at a cost of $5,600. Their last independent audit came when

Brozek took over as manager. Anderson said some of the items in the audit are notsignificant, but the review of procedures was valuable.

He would not comment whether Indiana Township will go with a professionalfirm or with the auditors next year.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.