ShareThis Page
Indisputable fact |

Indisputable fact

| Saturday, May 10, 2014 9:00 p.m

Regarding the editorial “Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi” : Scientists are correct when they say, as the editorial puts it, that “global greenhouse gas emissions have accelerated drastically since the turn of the century.” That is directly measurable and not up for dispute.

Would the Trib argue against reports of river flooding at the Mon Wharf parking lot? Of course not. When you have a direct measurement, the answer is what it is.

Science is providing real facts that we need to interpret. The interpretation of how these facts will change things is up for argument, and can be a matter of opinion. Argue with the scientists over their guesses about the future, but let us be sane and keep the facts of the moment.

It is difficult to consider an opinion piece that fails the logic test in its third paragraph.

David Bangley

Hanover Township

Beaver County

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.