ShareThis Page
Injured man, 60, identified |

Injured man, 60, identified

| Friday, February 10, 2006 12:00 a.m

A man who has been hospitalized since being found with head injuries in Hazelwood over the weekend was identified by his roommate on Thursday.

Donald Zankel, 60, who was found shortly before 6 p.m. Saturday in an alley near his home in the 4800 block of Second Avenue, remained in critical condition and on a ventilator last night in Mercy Hospital, Uptown.

Pittsburgh police said Zankel suffered head injuries when he apparently fell down steps.

“The police came into the hospital shortly after 6 p.m. (yesterday) with someone who made positive identification,” hospital spokeswoman Linda Ross said.

Hospital social workers had been trying to identify Zankel, who was awake but combative when he arrived in the emergency room. He did not provide any information about his identity and has since lapsed into unconsciousness.

Ross said it was the first time in at least 14 years that hospital officials could not identify a patient. Some previous patients were identified only by fingerprints, she said.

City police said detectives were called yesterday by hospital personnel.

Detectives attempted without success to identify Zankel through fingerprints and missing persons files. Hospital officials also notified the media, which began broadcasting descriptions of the man.

Some detectives and uniformed officers who were going door to door in Hazelwood yesterday afternoon found Zankel’s home and roommate.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.