ShareThis Page
Insights distinguish ‘Lovely’ from other indie films |

Insights distinguish ‘Lovely’ from other indie films

Ed Blank
| Friday, July 19, 2002 12:00 a.m

You could hurt yourself dodging all the denial in “Lovely & Amazing.”

Not that the Marks sisters and their mom don’t confront themselves.

They’re self-absorbed, especially about their bodies, and too inwardly directed to make much of relationships.

Jane (Brenda Blethyn), the divorced matriarch, is laying $10,000 out of pocket for liposuction that will relieve her of 10 pounds.

Dr. Crane (Michael Nouri) might see the flesh but not her unsolicited interest in him.

Jane’s 36-year-old daughter, Michelle (Catherine Keener), is a female variation on the former high school jock who has little else to offer and therefore peaks way too early.

She’s a former homecoming queen lost in an unfulfilling marriage to the unfaithful Bill (Clark Gregg). They have a daughter who is off doing her thing while Michelle sits mesmerized, with milk and cookies, watching the juvenile “Hickory Dog” on TV.

She makes odd, worthless crafts and snaps caustically at shopkeepers who won’t buy them.

Her slightly younger sister, Elizabeth (Emily Mortimer), is an exceptionally insecure, narcissistic, attractive actress who can’t understand why lover Paul (James Le Gros) would be more focused on his own writing career.

Her romantic audition with TV actor Kevin McCabe (Dermot Mulroney) is comically inept because she’s too self-aware to relax. She’s a rescuer, like her mother, but of dogs.

And then there’s Annie (Raven Goodwin), a plump 8-year-old who is the biological daughter of a crack addict. In late middle age, Jane has adopted Annie, whose bids for attention include faking death.

When Jane’s liposuction recovery goes awry, her three daughters reluctantly rearrange their priorities, leading to a displacement of their anger and uncertainty.

Michelle even takes a job as an $8-an-hour photo store employee, working for 17-year-old Jordan (Jake Gyllenhaal), whose mom has working radar.

“Lovely & Amazing,” which plays like a lightweight “Secrets and Lies,” was written and directed by Nicole Holofcener (“Walking and Talking”) with a good ear for the way life-sized people communicate and repel each other.

With its insights into the price of self-absorption, it distinguishes itself among recent independent American ensemble comedy-dramas and suggests Holofcener has a voice worth hearing.

‘Lovely & Amazing’

Director: Nicole Holofcener
Stars: Emily Mortimer, Catherine Keener, Brenda Blethyn
MPAA Rating: R, for language and nudity
Where: Denis in Mt. Lebanon; Manor in Squirrel Hill

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.