ShareThis Page
Internet body recommends restructuring |

Internet body recommends restructuring

The Associated Press
| Monday, February 25, 2002 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK (AP) – The president of the Internet’s oversight body recommended a major restructuring Sunday, saying the goal of leaving the Net in private hands has proved unworkable.

The new structure calls for governments to nominate one-third of the board of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the private organization chosen in 1998 to take over the Net’s management responsibilities from the U.S. government.

”I am now convinced that the original desire to avoid a totally governmental takeover … led to an overreaction – the choice of a totally private model,” said Stuart Lynn, ICANN’s president.

But he said the private model is unworkable ”because it leaves ICANN isolated from the real-world institutions – governments – whose backing and support are essential.”

ICANN is in charge of coordinating the Internet’s addressing policies, including those for domain names.

It has faced questions about its legitimacy from the beginning. Longtime Internet users accuse ICANN of being beholden to corporate interests, while administrators of domain names around the world have refused to recognize ICANN’s authority and pay dues.

The proposal, which came during a weekend closed-door retreat, is likely to face significant opposition from public-interest groups, particularly for eliminating direct participation by Internet users.

Currently, five of the 19 board members are elected by the general Internet community.

Under the new plan, the board would consist of 15 members: one third nominated by governments, one-third through a committee process and the rest consisting of ICANN’s president and appointments by four policy and technical groups.

ICANN’s next public meetings are scheduled for March 10-14 in Accra, Ghana.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.