Invention Convention held at Penn State New Kensington |

Invention Convention held at Penn State New Kensington


Kain Toy sounded like a budding Billy Mays on Saturday as he extolled the virtues of E-Z Paste.

“You can’t live without this,” Toy said, doing his best imitation of the late, legendary TV commercial spokesman as he huckstered the toothbrush with the built-in toothpaste supply.

Kain, 12, and his partner, Kyler Watterson, 12, both of Harrison, cooked up the device for the first Invention Convention at Penn State New Kensington. The event was sponsored by the Allegheny Valley Chamber of Commerce and Penn State, whose Electro-Optics Center at the Northpointe Industrial Park in Slate Lick provided the chamber with a $1,000 grant for the competition.

Nine teams of seventh-graders submitted inventions — eight from Highlands Middle School and the other from Springdale Junior High.

“This is our first year and we thought we’d run with what we get and then build on it next year,” said Chamber President Mary Bowlin.

“I’m just hoping one of these guys comes up with the next million-dollar idea,” said Chris Resek, Highlands Middle School science teacher. “I told them I want to retire soon.”

There was no shortage of ideas exhibited. The entries ran the gamut from belts to hold sports, office and beauty accessories — that was Springdale’s entry — to the Gumholder, small plastic containers that clip on to the edge of a plate to hold a person’s chewing gum while eating, to the Contact Buddy, a travel container for contact lens users, complete with collapsible mirror.

Judges Ben Campbell, an engineer at the Electro-Optics Center and Paul Hollinger, engineering manager for Accutronic USA in the RIDC Park in O’Hara, listened to each team’s presentation, then questioned the members.

They asked the E-Z Paste creators how they put their invention together. Toy and Watterson said they cut the handle off a toothbrush, drilled a hole in it to the bristles and then attached a lipstick-type container handle to hold the toothpaste. Twisting the bottom then supplies the brush with toothpaste.

“That’s a good combination of two technologies,” Campbell said.

Direct competition from the Squeezy Brush was just a few tables away. Hannah Young, 12, of Brackenridge and Harrison residents Sarah Holsing, 12, Kathryn Beck, 12, and Joshua Nulph, 13, billed their invention as a throwaway travel toothbrush. It also featured a sawed-off toothbrush with the handle replaced by clear plastic tube filled with toothpaste. Instead of turning the handle, Squeezy Brush users feed toothpaste to the bristles via a drilled hole by squeezing the toothpaste reservoir. It also had the benefit of a strong presentation by Nulph, another Billy Mays’ aficionado.

As for E-Z Paste, Nulph said, “It doesn’t look like it holds as much toothpaste, but it is a good idea.”

Watterson acknowledged the strong Squeezy Brush presentation, saying “Yeah, but ours is refillable.”

“So we have the edge,” Toy added.

In the end, they did.

E-Z Paste took first prize with each of its inventors awarded $100 checks. Second place and $50 checks went to the Contact Buddy devised by Cole Bradley and Jacob Hughes, while the Pittsburgh-izer, a locker organizer with Terrible Towel motif, created by Abby Kuchek and Deanna Webb won third place and $25 checks.

“You guys did a fantastic job,” Hollinger told the teams. “This was a very hard decision. You guys are all winners.”

Resek agreed. “I’m proud of them because for them, this was completely above and beyond. I didn’t give out extra points for this,” he said. “And, it turned out to be a very good learning experience for them.”



TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.