ShareThis Page
Investigators seek fatal crash cause |

Investigators seek fatal crash cause

| Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:00 a.m

A Blairsville woman killed in a two-vehicle crash Tuesday on Route 119 in Burrell Township died of injuries sustained in the accident, according to the Indiana County Coroner’s office.

An autopsy performed on Donna McDowell, 68, of Old William Penn Highway, showed severe internal injuries of the chest and multiple fractures, said Michael Baker, chief deputy coroner.

“The autopsy showed there was no indication that McDowell suffered a cardiac event or stroke that may have led to her losing control of her car and crossing into the path of another vehicle in the construction zone,” Baker said. “An investigation is continuing to determine if a mechanical malfunction in McDowell’s 1998 Toyota Camry may have been a factor in the crash.”

McDowell was pronounced dead at the scene at 4:20 p.m. by Baker, who said her car crossed the center line and hit a 1988 Chevrolet minivan driven by Nicholas Sabatine Jr., 59, of Blacklick.

Sandra Wissinger, 45, of Blacklick, was extricated from the vehicle and flown to UPMC Presbyterian. A hospital spokesman said she was in fair condition last night. Sabatine was flown to Memorial Medical Center in Johnstown for treatment of injuries. A hospital spokesman last night said Sabatine had been released.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.