ShareThis Page
Iran holds onto drone, wants apology from U.S. |

Iran holds onto drone, wants apology from U.S.

| Wednesday, December 14, 2011 12:00 a.m

TEHRAN — Iranian officials on Tuesday demanded an apology from the Obama administration before they would consider any request to return a surveillance drone that Iran captured this month.

“President Obama should not forget that that the Iranian airspace was clearly violated by the U.S. drone, and therefore the U.S. should first apologize for that,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said.

Iran has said it used an “electronic ambush” to gain control of the top-secret RQ-170 Sentinel drone and land it with minimal damage about 140 miles inside Iran. The capture was announced on Dec. 4, and the Pentagon acknowledged that a U.S. drone had been lost the preceding week.

Obama said on Monday that the United States wants Iran to return the radar-evading stealth aircraft. “We have asked for it back. We’ll see how the Iranians respond,” Obama said during a White House news conference with visiting Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

“Obama begs Iran to give him back his toy plane,” the semiofficial Fars News Agency concluded in a headline.

While several Iranian officials said there was no chance that Iran would return the drone, some key figures said any move to do so must be preceded by an official U.S. apology.

The United States previously rebuffed Iranian demands for apologies. In 1988, a Navy guided-missile cruiser shot down an Iranian civilian airliner by mistake over the Strait of Hormuz, killing all 290 people on board.

The U.S. government expressed regret over the incident and paid nearly $62 million in compensation but stopped short of issuing a formal apology, maintaining that U.S. crew members thought they were about to be attacked by an Iranian warplane.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.