Iran’s Latin allies |

Iran’s Latin allies


Henry Kissinger famously asked whether Iran sees itself as a “nation” with a role in the international system or a “cause” that seeks to overturn the system through a global populist revolution.

Iran’s activities not just in its own backyard but also south of our border — in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua — suggest the latter, and that poses a growing threat that the United States should counter quickly.

Iran’s path to growing Latin American influence comes with an ironic twist. When President James Monroe enunciated the “Monroe Doctrine” two centuries ago, warning Europe to keep its hands off the region, it was Simon Bolivar and other revolutionaries who reacted warmly because it supported their efforts to emancipate their Latin American territories from the grips of Europe’s colonial powers.

Now, it is Iran and its allies in Venezuela and the other Latin American nations that cite Bolivar as they work to unseat the United States from its perch atop the world’s pecking order and create a post-American global order.

Tehran’s support for Hezbollah and other terrorist groups, its efforts to de-stabilize states in the Middle East and its quest for nuclear weaponry raise great concern by themselves. They become ever more frightening when considered in the context of an intercontinental alliance of revolutionaries with a shared agenda and growing working relationships.

This unlikely alliance is fueled by a fervent anti-Americanism and driven by a desire to undermine U.S. influence across the Americas and the world. Anti-Americanism is the theme of public statements by Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, Bolivia’s Evo Morales, Ecuador’s Rafael Correa and Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega after their frequent visits with one another.

Iran has what the Latin capitals want and vice versa, fostering a marriage of convenience that extends from trade, development and banking to the sharing of natural resources, to military cooperation.

Iran has tripled its investment in the region in the past several years, delivering hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to each of its Latin American allies. Tehran has begun manufacturing operations in Venezuela and launched a joint venture to fund development projects in both countries.

Iran is helping Venezuela build the infrastructure for its own nuclear program, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has trained Venezuela’s secret services and police, and Iran-backed Hezbollah has expanded its operations in Venezuela and received financial and other support from Caracas.

In return, the Latin nations have rallied around Iran’s quest for nuclear weaponry and sought to undermine efforts by the U.N. Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Commission to pressure Tehran.

Venezuela has gone further, letting Iran use its banking system to evade financial sanctions. In addition, with Iran dependent on imported refined petroleum, oil-rich Venezuela offered to send it up to 20,000 barrels of gasoline a day. And seeking to further enhance its nuclear capability, Iran is working with Venezuela to extract uranium within its borders — giving Tehran a potentially more important route to key materials to make its nuclear pursuit a success.

Iran’s alliance with the Latin nations is helping all sides promote an agenda that is challenging the United States on the world stage and nearer to home. It’s time for Washington to respond accordingly.

Lawrence Haas is senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.