ShareThis Page
Iraqi abuse scandal: Local reservists singled out in report |

Iraqi abuse scandal: Local reservists singled out in report

A Fayette County soldier was singled out as a central figure in the Abu Ghraib prisoner-abuse scandal in a military investigator’s report released Wednesday.

The report authored by Maj. Gen. George R. Fay identifies Cpl. Charles A. Graner Jr., of Uniontown, as a major player in the abuse of Iraqi detainees last year. Graner, who is facing court-martial, was linked in the report to 11 of 44 abuse incidents.

The 177-page document also indicates that New Stanton native Capt. Donald Reese, commanding officer of the 372nd Military Police Company, of Cresaptown, Md., was aware that Iraqi detainees were paraded around the prison naked as an interrogation technique.

Fay’s report contradicts statements Reese made during an interview with the Tribune-Review last week.

Reese said the alleged abuses occurred over a three-day period shortly after the unit was ordered to run the prison last October. However, Fay identified 27 abuse incidents between early October 2003 and Jan. 8, while the prison was under Reese’s command.

Reese, who returned home earlier this month, could not be reached for comment Thursday.

The Fay Report was publicized a day after the release of a separate independent review of detention operations in Iraq. Both placed much of the blame for alleged abuses on military police officers and military intelligence officers at the prison.

Reese, a window blind salesman in civilian life, has not been accused of abusing prisoners. However, Fay wrote that Reese knew something appeared out of the ordinary.

“There’s a lot of nude people here,” Reese is quoted as saying to military officials upon his arrival at the prison last October.

Some of the nudity was attributed to a lack of clothing and uniforms for detainees. However, Fay said it could not be determined what happened to the prisoners’ original clothing.

The report noted the lack of clothing was used as an interrogation technique, but “is significant in that it likely contributed to a dehumanization of the detainees and set the stage for additional and more severe abuses to occur.”

Although Reese, the unit’s commander, also is named in a section of the report that describes Iraqi detainees being stripped of their clothing and forced to wear women’s underwear on their heads, he was not identified as a participant in that incident.

Reese was not named specifically, but his judgment was criticized in the separate independent review released Tuesday. That report, authored by commission Chairman James Schlesinger, concluded that the 372nd Company reservists were not properly trained for prison duty and that they were thinly stretched in dealing with the large number of detainees.

“With little experience to fall back on, the company commander deferred to noncommissioned officers who had civilian correction backgrounds to work the night shift. This deference was a significant error in judgment,” Schlesinger wrote.

Graner — who was photographed posing with naked Iraqi detainees — became one of the international faces of the abuse case after the photos were published around the world. He faces a lengthy military prison sentence if convicted.

Fay’s report and Schlesinger’s review each accuse Graner of participating in physical and mental abuses of Iraqi prisoners. He was one of two guards assigned leadership duties while on night shift at the prison because of his background as a corrections officer.

Graner, who worked in civilian life as a guard at the State Correctional Institution at Greene County, has argued that he acted at the behest of military intelligence officers. The reports, though, suggest Graner and six other military police officers in his unit were primarily responsible for their actions.

“The aberrant behavior on the night shift in Cell Block 1 at Abu Ghraib would have been avoided with proper training, leadership and oversight. Though acts of abuse occurred at a number of locations, those in Cell Block 1 have a unique nature fostered by the predilections of the noncommissioned officers in charge. Had these noncommissioned officers behaved more like those on the day shift, these acts, which one participant described as ‘just for the fun of it,’ would not have taken place,” according to the independent review.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.