ShareThis Page
IRS to more actively seek those that hide income |

IRS to more actively seek those that hide income

| Friday, September 13, 2002 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service plans to focus more attention on high-income individuals and those involved in tax avoidance schemes such as credit cards issued by offshore banks.

The intent of the new audit strategy announced Thursday is to uncover methods taxpayers use to avoid taxes and hide income from the IRS, rather than simply checking returns that are filed for mistakes or relatively simple omissions.

IRS Commissioner Charles Rossotti, while insisting the agency is “not giving anybody a free ride,” said the aim is to free up auditors to focus on such things as tax shelters, offshore credit cards used to hide income, wealthy people who fail to file returns and other major problems.

“The real world is such that we have limited resources,” Rossotti said. “We are trying to figure out as best we can where is the most threat to the system.”

The IRS estimates the nation’s “tax gap,” the difference between income taxes that should be paid and what is actually collected, at $207 billion annually. Not all of that lost revenue is due to cheating, but evaders do make up a significant portion.

Much of the unpaid tax bill comes from income that is never reported to the IRS. To get at this problem, the IRS has developed a new statistical method of selecting returns with a high probability of unreported income.

Rossotti said the previous formula used “did not focus on what was not on the return, on income that might not have been reported at all.”

Among the tax avoidance schemes to be targeted for audits are promoters of nonexistent slavery reparations, who make frivolous arguments to avoid filing returns, abusive tax shelters and trusts and employment schemes such as paying in cash and filing false payroll tax returns.

Rossotti said the IRS already has 150 ongoing audits of tax shelter promoters, with another 150 in the beginning stages of an audit.

Focusing more audits on higher-income taxpayers would also alter the perception that the IRS pays greater attention to the modest-income people than to the rich. While calling that perception unfair, Rossotti did say that because 60 percent of income taxes are paid by those earning $100,000 an up, it was important to concentrate on them.

The move also comes as the IRS struggles to increase the number of returns it audits, which rose slightly to 732,000 last year — about 1 in every 173 — but remains far below the 1.9 million audited in 1996. The IRS is in the midst of a project, its first since 1988, of randomly auditing about 50,000 of this year’s returns to gather research on tax filing and errors.

“The really big point is that we’re trying to maintain the faith that the honest taxpayer has in the system,” Rossotti said. “We know that when people abuse the system, it tends to reduce that faith.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.