ShareThis Page
Irwin native will vanish on late-night TV |

Irwin native will vanish on late-night TV

| Wednesday, February 4, 2009 12:00 a.m

It took a bit of magic for Amber Alberts to make her way onto “The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson.”

The Irwin native plans to disappear after she gets there.

Alberts, 23, a magician’s assistant, and magician Jason Hudy, 24, will appear on the CBS show tonight as part of Magic Week.

“I’m really nervous,” she says. “It’s not just a live audience. A ton of people are going to see it on TV.”

They say it was magical how they got their big break.

Alberts and Hudy were working together at Kennywood in 2007, when Ferguson preformed at the Palace Theatre in Greensburg. After seeing a story about how much Ferguson’s son loves magic, they sent the comedian a magic kit. They did it with the help of a friend who worked at the theater at the time, Alberts says.

“A few years later he’s inviting us to perform on his show,” she says.

The trick they’ll perform tonight is called OpArt. It’s an illusion in which Alberts is placed into a puzzle, and piece by piece her body vanishes. She’s then brought back in one piece.

“I’m excited, but I just want to get it over with,” she says.

Alberts, a graduate of Penn-Trafford High School, moved to Flint, Mich., last summer to join Hudy’s company, Premier Magic Productions. The two perform shows at high schools, theme parks and fairs.

She got hooked on magic while working as a magician’s assistant at Kennywood in summer 2005.

Alberts, a dancer since she was 2, had auditioned for a dance performance, she says. Instead, she was hired for a magic act.

“When you’re a dancer, you’re in the background,” Alberts says. “And what I like about being a magician’s assistant is they can’t do the trick without you, so people get to see you.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.