ShareThis Page
Islanders polish off Penguins |

Islanders polish off Penguins

Karen Price
| Sunday, November 17, 2002 12:00 a.m

Marc Bergevin has had enough of the downhill officiating in the NHL, and on Saturday night he wasn’t afraid to talk about it.

“Write what you saw,” the Penguins defenseman said, as reporters entered the dressing room following the Penguins’ 3-2 loss to the Islanders. “It’s a (expletive) farce. This league’s a joke. They change it for what, 10 games, 15 games• I honestly thought it was going to change. It was a rodeo out there. It was unbelievable.”

Bergevin expects a fine from the league and will gladly pay it to let his opinion be heard. He was referring, of course, to the eight penalties called on the Penguins and the five on the Islanders. He was also referring to the 10 that weren’t called, if the ones that were had been an indicator of what was and was not a penalty.

“I’m not trying to take anything away from New York; they played hard. They deserved to win,” Bergevin said. “That’s not what I’m trying to say. But it’s a (expletive) joke. Did you guys see it• Did you watch the same game I did• Am I wrong?”

The league’s promised crackdown on obstruction and interference had been in decline for several games. And it wasn’t just with the Penguins. Teams around the league had been commenting over the past two weeks on a belief that the officiating was slipping. But Saturday night’s game seemed to be the most inconsistently officiated game of the Penguins’ season.

The Penguins are now winless in their last five games (0-3-1-1) and fell to 7-5-3-1 on the season. This was their first game back at Mellon Arena after four on the road, and two of the next three are on the road as well.

After calling three penalties in the first period, referees Don Van Massenhoven and Ian Walsh called five in the second – all on the Penguins. They called five total in the third, and both calls against the Penguins were made while they were on the power play. Bergevin was given a gross misconduct at the end of the game when he skated toward the officials yelling. There will be a league review to determine if he will be suspended or not. It was his only penalty of the game.

While most everyone in the Penguins’ locker room felt the same frustration, they were all quick to give credit to the Islanders and goaltender Chris Osgood. He backstopped his team to just their sixth win of the season by stopping 33 shots on goal. Oleg Kvasha gave his team the lead at 7:24 in the first period and Adrian Aucoin got it back with a power-play goal at 17:03. Jason Wiemer padded the lead at 15:46 to make it 3-1. Captain Michael Peca was in the lineup, but played only 7:24 to rest him in the third period.

Even with the penalties they took, the Penguins had enough opportunities to win the game. Their 35 shots on goal were the highest total since their 3-2 win over Atlanta on Oct. 16.

Lemieux brought the Penguins within one with a goal in the final five minutes of the game. It was their first goal since midway through the first period when Alexei Kovalev scored. Osgood stopped the first shot from Aleksey Morozov, but Lemieux got the rebound coming down the left side for his first goal in four games.

“It was a tough game; things just didn’t go our way,” Lemieux said. “We just have to regroup and look forward to the next game. I can’t comment on (the officiating). I wish I could, but I can’t.”

With all the time spent on special teams, the game lacked any kind of flow after the first period. What started out as a promising back-and-forth game deteriorated.

“It just kills the whole momentum of the game,” Lemieux said. “You can’t get your players in there; you’re using pretty much the same guys the whole time. It’s tough to come back from that.”

The Penguins got bad news when defenseman Michal Rozsival left the game with four minutes remaining in the first period. He was nailed by right winger Steve Webb, who came flying across right to left on Rozsival, who was looking away from the hit. He suffered a separated shoulder and Penguins coach Rick Kehoe said he’ll probably be out for a while.

“I’m not commenting on (the game),” Kehoe said. “I’m just not commenting on it. There’s nothing to say. We had more chances tonight than we’ve had in a long time five-on-five and (Osgood) was the difference.”

Karen Price is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.