It might be time for the old standbys on U.S. team |

It might be time for the old standbys on U.S. team

The Associated Press

FOXBORO, Mass. — Versatility and depth got the U.S. women this far. Now, they’ll probably need the old standbys to advance further in the World Cup.

The Americans face their nemesis, Norway, in the quarterfinals Wednesday. With no room for error, the United States winds up with a match against the only nation that owns a winning record against it: 18-16-2. The U.S. team is ranked first in the world, and Norway is second.

But because Norway finished behind Brazil in its opening-round group, the crossover schedule puts the Norwegians directly in the Americans’ path. Norway won the 1995 World Cup after beating the United States in the semifinals, then it defeated the Americans to win the 2000 Olympics.

Such U.S. veterans as Mia Hamm, Kristine Lilly and Julie Foudy can’t expect any more time off for the rest of the tournament. And if they and their teammates are not at peak efficiency, there might not be any more to the tournament for them.

“They’re a tremendous team,” said Hamm, who sat out the 3-0 victory over North Korea on Sunday. “They’re a team that with one service forward can put the ball in the back of the net. We understand that, and we respect that.

“No matter how you feel about possession in the game, Norway can change it, like I said, with one long ball, one flick. They have players that can get behind your defense, players that are world-class finishers in the air. They organize well around the goal offensively and defensively. It’s a battle, and it’s a battle for 90-plus minutes.”

Lilly and Foudy, who each played a half against the Koreans, and Hamm and defender Joy Fawcett are in their fourth World Cup. They’ve had some memorable meetings with the Norwegians, from a 2-1 victory in the 1991 World Cup final to a 1-0 loss in the ’95 Cup semis; from a 2-1 overtime win for the 1996 Olympic crown to a 3-2 overtime loss in the Sydney Games final.

The teams did not meet in the 1999 World Cup, where Norway was routed by China, 5-0, in the semifinals — in Foxboro.

So while the Norwegians might not have great memories of the area, they won’t be intimidated by the Americans.

“They’ve been to the top, and they have played us very tough every time we play them,” Foudy said. “They know what’s at stake, and they’ll come out with their best game.”

Norway finally did that Saturday when it got two goals each from captain Dagny Mellgren and Linda Ormen and routed South Korea, 7-1, after a previous 4-1 loss to Brazil.

“We played a great game compared with the last one,” Mellgren said. “We did a lot of things well, and some players came in and did well.”

Many players have come in and done well for the United States, giving coach April Heinrichs the luxury of resting such stars as Hamm, Foudy and Lilly. And while World Cup newcomers Cat Reddick, Shannon Boxx, Kylie Bivens and Abby Wambach have been superb, the veterans now figure to become a focal point of the action.

That particularly means Hamm, who was sensational in the first two games, Foudy, Lilly, Fawcett and goalkeeper Briana Scurry.

“It’s all about winning now,” Scurry said. “It’s not about points. It’s about somehow finding a way to win. We are very confident, and we are very excited about the way everyone is playing.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.