ShareThis Page
Jack Heim to leave local TV show ‘Talk of the Town’ |

Jack Heim to leave local TV show ‘Talk of the Town’

Michael Miller
| Monday, May 20, 2002 12:00 a.m

KITTANNING – Jack Heim often based his show, “Talk of the Town,” on differences of opinion.

Citing a disagreement in programming with station officials at Family-Life TV, Heim announced yesterday that he was no longer hosting the show, which airs at 8 p.m. Tuesdays.

Heim said that he asked for a tape of one of his previous shows to run on Tuesday because he didn’t have a guest, but that the station decided to air a program called “Pathways” with state Rep. Jeff Coleman and U.S. Rep. Phil English.

David Croyle, speaking for Family-Life, said the decision to run “Pathways” in Heim’s slot was two-fold – the state primary was a week away and both Coleman and English are up for re-election, and the show had sponsorship.

“Family-Life deeply regrets the decision made by Mr. Heim to not continue as host,” Croyle said. “We will actively look for another host.”

Heim’s show was one of the more popular shows on the station and often featured guests such as the county commissioners.

It also offered lighthearted fare as well, such as call-ins to Santa Claus and “things that used to be” shows.

“Mr. Croyle, for 10 years, gave me complete freedom,” Heim said, but added that not running the program he requested on Tuesday upset him.

“I honestly want people to know I won’t be on anymore,” said Heim. “I made a lot of friends through that show and I do appreciate that.”

“I think those shows were good shows and I think they served a purpose,” he added.

Croyle said the time slot will continue to be used as “a venue for community opinion.”

Local insurance broker George Capone will host the show May 21, Croyle said, adding that the station is looking for a permanent replacement.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.