ShareThis Page
Job growth better than reported |

Job growth better than reported

| Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:00 a.m

The Kerry campaign has been making much hay over the “disappointing” July jobs numbers. The economy hasn’t “turned the corner,” as President Bush claims, but has done a “U-turn,” John Kerry said. It’s an easy assertion to make — if one uses the statistics selectively.

Businesses, about 400,000 total, reported the creation of 32,000 net payroll jobs last month, far below government projections. But the survey represents only about one-third of all employers. Not included are the self-employed, farm employment and start-up businesses.

The households survey, which includes those categories, interviews 60,000 individuals. And it found the total number of Americans working in July grew by a robust 629,000, 19.6 times the numbers found in the business survey.

It’s a figure you’d have a difficult time finding in most media accounts.

Yes, big businesses are reluctant to hire when they feel uncertain about the economy. And it’s clear they now do. But productivity continues to be quite high. That said, the fact that the household survey shows healthy growth is indicative of burgeoning optimism.

Mr. Kerry promises better. But it’s difficult to see how he can deliver, considering most of the Kerry economic “plan” revolves around the typical Democratic smoke and mirrors. The National Taxpayer Union says Kerry’s plan would increase federal net spending by $6,066 for each and every taxpayer over four years.

Translation: John Kerry says he’ll help Americans by robbing them.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.