ShareThis Page
John Dorfman: This year’s stock market losers could be in for a January bounce |

John Dorfman: This year’s stock market losers could be in for a January bounce

John Dorfman
| Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:45 a.m
Bloomberg News
Bloomberg News columnist, John Dorfman, smiles on July 28, 1999 in Newton, MA. Photographer: Julia Malakie. Bloomberg News.

For as long as I can remember, stocks that are down in the first 10 months of the year have been ground further into the dirt in November. It’s a natural thing: Investors and traders heave their losers overboard to get a tax deduction. When January comes, the previous year’s duds often bounce back. Some years the January rebound is stronger than others. Occasionally, it doesn’t even happen. But most of the time it does. I look for January rebound candidates each year around this time. That’s because, as the January bounce phenomenon has become well known, people sometimes jump the gun and snatch up losers in December. I don’t know how the January bounce will play out this time, but I operate on the assumption that it will happen. Quite a few stocks that were pummeled in 2018 strike me as rebound candidates.

Applied Materials

As recently as March, investors would pay as much as $61 a share for Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT). Today, they will pay less than $36. The Santa Clara, Calif., company makes equipment to manufacture semiconductors, and also flat screens and solar equipment.

Investors lowered their bids because the semiconductor industry, notoriously cyclical, gives signs of flopping over into the next down cycle. I don’t pooh-pooh the concern, but here’s a first-class company now selling for eight times earnings — a bargain.

I think the selling is overdone and will be surprised if the shares don’t bounce back in January. Lennar Homebuilder Lennar Corp. (LEN), with headquarters in Miami, has suffered along with its peers as a much-anticipated comeback for the homebuilding industry has fizzled. Rising interest rates (on mortgages in particular), rising home prices and high student debt has blocked new homeowners. Lennar operates in about 20 states, and sells its homes for an average of $380,000, according to Dun & Bradstreet. That puts it in the middle of the price spectrum. The company has earned a profit each year following losses in 2007-09. Profits are unspectacular, but I think the stock is oversold. It’s down 35 percent this year to about $41, which is only eight times earnings and slightly less than book value (corporate net worth per share). Beasley Broadcast

A much smaller company is Beasley Broadcast Group Inc. (BBGI), which operates 63 radio stations in 15 cities. It likes to own several stations in a city so they can share functions such as selling advertising, while concentrating on different audiences (music, talk, sports and so on). The company has grown earnings well in the past, but two of the three latest quarters have been down, spooking investors. They have pounded the stock down 56 percent this year, to under $6. At that price, the stock sells for well below book value, and for only eight times earnings. Jupai Holdings

A lot of Chinese stocks have bitten the dust this year, as an economic slowdown in China has been aggravated by a tariff tiff with the United States.

I like quite a few Chinese equities now. One is Jupai Holdings Ltd. (JP), which is an investment management company based in Shanghai. The stock is down 52 percent this year through Nov. 16 and trades at a little below $9. The asset-management business in the United States is crowded and highly competitive. In China, it’s a newer industry with fewer players. Jupai is one of the larger ones, and it has been consistently profitable to this point.

Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS) owns more than 8 percent of the company. Other significant holders include Renaissance Technologies, Morgan Stanley and Millennium Management. Past Record

I’ve recommended January bounce candidates in 15 previous columns. They have gained an average of 13.9 percent in the 12 months following publication, compared to 8.4 percent for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Ten of the 15 columns have shown a profit; nine have beaten the S&P 500. Last year’s bunch gained an average of 21.5 percent despite a big loss in Bed, Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). A gain of almost 102 percent in Advance Auto Parts Inc. (AAP) did the trick.

Bear in mind that my column recommendations are theoretical and don’t reflect actual trades, trading costs or taxes. Their results shouldn’t be confused with the performance of portfolios I manage for clients, and past performance doesn’t predict future results. My bounce candidates aren’t guaranteed to bounce. But I think they have pretty good odds.

Disclosure: I don’t currently own the stocks discussed in today’s column, personally or for clients. However, I may buy one or more of them in the next couple of weeks.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached at

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached via email.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.