ShareThis Page
Joseph Sabino Mistick: Crenshaw, not Trump, got it right on Veterans Day |

Joseph Sabino Mistick: Crenshaw, not Trump, got it right on Veterans Day

Joseph Sabino Mistick
| Saturday, November 17, 2018 6:03 p.m

Veterans Day is usually not controversial. And it should not be.

The official date has jumped around a little. Initially, it marked the date World War I ended. Congress switched it to a Monday in 1971, but President Gerald Ford restored it to Nov. 11, because that was sacred.

Sometimes the Veterans Day parades across the country cause a little dust-up. It might be a question of scheduling or a dispute over who gets to march in the parade.

Other than that, it has usually been a solemn recognition of the sacrifices our fellow citizens have made to secure for us the freedoms we enjoy every day. This year was different.

There were two controversies, one from the entertainment world and one at the highest level of our government. And, we learned more about the meaning of Veterans Day from a former Navy Seal and a young comedian than we did from our nation’s leaders.

On the Nov. 3 airing of “Saturday Night Live,” comedian Pete Davidson mocked Dan Crenshaw, then a candidate for Congress from Texas. Crenshaw lost his eye in an explosion in Iraq, and he wears a black
eye patch.

Davidson’s wisecracking style failed this time. And much of America weighed in, expressing a level of outrage that we have come to expect these days. But, Crenshaw did everything possible to tamp it down.

Appearing on the next “SNL” broadcast, Crenshaw accepted Davidson’s apology. Then, with good humor, he said Davidson looks “like if the meth from ‘Breaking Bad’ was a person.” And he played his ringtone, a song by Ariana Grande, Davidson’s ex-girlfriend. It was great stuff.

But, Crenshaw’s final comments were serious. He said, “Americans can forgive one another. We can remember what brings us together as a country and still see the good in each other.”

Our elected leader had a different approach. Donald Trump traveled to France to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the World War I armistice. He insulted our allies and scowled a lot. He arrived late for events and mostly stayed in his room.

He skipped a visit to the American military cemetery near Belleau Wood, where nearly 2,000 American troops died in 1918. He said it was raining too hard, but the other Western leaders made it.

Once back home, he called for vote counting in Florida to stop before military ballots were counted. And, according to Fox News, neither Trump nor Vice President Mike Pence visited Arlington National Cemetery.

Trump’s attitude toward the military has always been hard to figure. He fancies generals, keeping them close. But he fails to honor those on the ground — belittling prisoners of war and insulting Gold Star families.

Maybe it’s because he never served. The truth is that most Americans will never serve in uniform, and many presidents have not had military experience. But this inability to honor the sacrifice of those who have shouldered the burden for the rest of us is deeply troubling.

Crenshaw is now a Congressman-elect, and he gets it right. He wrote in The Washington Post that he used his “SNL” appearance “to send a message of unity, forgiveness and appreciation for veterans.”

Joseph Sabino Mistick is a Pittsburgh lawyer.
Reach him at

Joseph Sabino Mistick is a Pittsburgh lawyer. Reach him at

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.