ShareThis Page
Judge refuses to sign LB consent order |

Judge refuses to sign LB consent order

Michael Aubele
| Friday, December 6, 2002 12:00 a.m

LOWER BURRELL: Council is scrambling to avoid a lawsuit after a Westmoreland County judge this week refused to sign a proposed consent order council needs to avoid liability for breaking state law.

Councilman Richard Kotecki, in August, hired an electrical contractor for work at Wolf Pak Park that Kotecki said cost more than he anticipated. The bill exceeded $10,000, forcing council to violate a state ordinance concerning the fair-bidding process should it sign the check.

The Third Class City Code stipulates that council solicit bids for jobs exceeding $10,000. Council did not solicit bids for the work.

Moreover, council violated a city ordinance that requires quotes from at least three businesses for work that exceeds $4,000. However, there is no penalty for violating that ordinance.

Kotecki hired Artman Electrical Contracting of Lower Burrell for three jobs that among other things included running underground wires and installing new fuse boxes. Bill Artman, company owner, said in a Thursday phone interview that the city owes $11,300 for the work.

Council, meanwhile, said Thursday that there are discrepancies as to how much it owes. Kotecki said the contractor gave the city three bills totaling $10,200, which is far less than the near $14,000 figure solicitor Steve Yakopec gave the city.

Whatever the cost, council said it is unsure where it will find the money to pay the bill.

City Clerk Ed Kirkwood said the money to pay the bill isn’t available from the parks and recreation department, of which Kotecki is chairman.

“We’re going to have to transfer from somewhere else,” Kirkwood said. “The problem is, I don’t know where we’re going to transfer from.”

Complicating matters is Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas Judge Charles Loughran’s request that the city better advertise its petition to have the consent order awarded and that it clarify its argument.

Loughran said in a phone interview Wednesday that it appeared as if the city was suing Artman, when in reality Artman should be suing the city.

“I told them, ‘He should be suing you,'” Loughran said.

Artman said he is unsure how he will deal with the city, saying he most likely will pursue a lawsuit if the city doesn’t present a good plan for payment.

Council said it will adhere to Loughran’s requests and will authorize a plan of attack at its Monday meeting.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.