ShareThis Page
Judge rules against Mt. Lebanon man in online gaming case |

Judge rules against Mt. Lebanon man in online gaming case

| Friday, April 1, 2011 12:00 a.m

A federal judge ruled Thursday that a Mt. Lebanon man violated an online game company’s intellectual property rights and ordered him to pay $300,000 in damages.

Evony LLC of New York City sued Philip J. Holland, 23, and Xandium Studios for running a bootleg copy of its multiplayer, online game Evony on his own site as “Evony Second Opinion,” as well as selling add-ons that allow players to circumvent the game’s rules and requirements.

Holland never filed a response to Evony’s claims and showed up at the last hearing in the case without a lawyer. U.S. District Judge Terrence McVerry ruled that Holland’s lack of a defense is an acknowledgment that Evony’s claims are true.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.