Archive

Judge rules in favor of Seven Springs Mountain Resort over road closure | TribLIVE.com
News

Judge rules in favor of Seven Springs Mountain Resort over road closure

Gtr7Springs112415
Seven Springs Mountain Resort started making snow on Sunday, Nov. 22, 2015.

A Fayette County judge has denied a request to keep a road open near Seven Springs Mountain Resort in winter, a situation the ski resort said could have crippled its operations.

With the order in hand and temperatures dipping below freezing during the weekend, Seven Springs began making snow on Sunday.

“We are quite pleased and supportive of the ruling, and we are thankful that our local community, our 1,800 employees and our guests can move forward with our preparations for another fantastic winter,” said Katie Buchan, communications manager for the resort.

The resort’s “snow guns” will continue to operate as conditions allow, but Seven Springs has not yet announced an opening date.

Gabriel and Gloria Hudock of Canonsburg filed a lawsuit earlier this month seeking to stop Seven Springs from dumping artificial snow on Neals Run Road, located near the resort on the mountain’s north face. The couple purchased land for $1 million along the road in 2007 and built a second home there in 2008, according to county property records.

The road traditionally is closed from Nov. 15 to April 1 to accommodate the resort, according to legal briefs filed with the lawsuit. In exchange, the resort pays fees to the township, which totaled $497,248 when the suit was filed.

The Hudocks say an alternate route to their home is unreliable and treacherous, according to the lawsuit. They argue a public road cannot be closed to benefit a private entity, and they are seeking to force the resort and township to keep the road open and clear of snow in winter.

Until the lawsuit is resolved, the Hudocks wanted a judge to issue a preliminary injunction forcing the township to keep the road open – including for the current ski season. But in an order handed down last week, Judge Nancy Vernon denied the request.

In denying the preliminary injunction, Vernon found the Hudocks failed to prove “immediate and irreparable harm” because they have “owned the property for a period of seven years under the same conditions in regard to Neals Run Road.”

Had Vernon ordered the road to be kept open, the resort would have lost 73 percent of its skiable terrain, said its attorney, John R. Merinar of Bridgeport, W.Va., in legal documents.

About 13,000 skiers and snowboarders who purchased season passes for the upcoming season would have been immediately impacted if the road had been kept open, according to the resort, and it risked the loss of hundreds of seasonal jobs and millions of dollars in tax revenues.

Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.