ShareThis Page
Judge to decide on admissibility of expert |

Judge to decide on admissibility of expert

| Thursday, March 5, 2009 12:00 a.m

Prosecutors in Armstrong County told a judge Wednesday that the testimony of an expert on false confessions should be inadmissible at an Apollo man’s homicide trial scheduled to begin next week.

Common Pleas Judge James Panchik granted the defense’s request in February to have the expert testify at the trial of Frederick Anthony Robinson, 54, who is charged with setting a fire on Sept. 2, 2005, that killed Crystal Johnson, 40, and her three children, ages 11, 5 and 2.

Prosecutors have since questioned the admissibility of Allison Redlich’s testimony as an expert witness in the field of false confessions. Panchik said he will rule on the issue before trial.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.