ShareThis Page
Jurors take tour on opening day of Somerset slaying trial |

Jurors take tour on opening day of Somerset slaying trial

| Saturday, March 26, 2011 12:00 a.m

A Somerset County jury hit the road on Friday, the first day of the murder trial of a former Jennerstown man accused of murdering his wife 29 years ago.

John D. Dawson, 61, of Jacksonville, Fla., is accused of slaying his wife, Kathleen Dawson, 30, on Nov. 9, 1981.

President Judge John M. Cascio, District Attorney Jerry Spangler and defense attorney Joseph B. Policicchio accompanied 12 jurors, plus four alternates, on a school bus as they drove to various locations that will be mentioned during the weeklong trial.

Dawson, dressed in a gray suit and tie, occasionally whispered in Policicchio’s ear as Cascio outlined the bus trip to jurors immediately after they were sworn in. Cascio told jurors they will hear opening statements Monday.

Jurors traveled to Windber Hospital, now Windber Medical Center, where Kathleen Dawson worked as a nurse. They were to travel potential routes through Conemaugh Township to Jennerstown that she usually took on her way home after her shift ended at 11 p.m.

About 75 minutes later, Dawson’s 1980 Plymouth Horizon sedan was discovered on fire along what was then known as John Cable Hill Road, less than 8 miles from her Jennerstown home. The bus drove to that location.

Conemaugh Township police found a bloody blackjack, a small club-type weapon, near the car, a 17-foot trail of blood from the vehicle over an embankment, and a damaged rear bumper and broken taillight, according to the affidavit of probable cause filed by state police in Somerset.

An autopsy on the burned body of Dawson showed she died from multiple skull fractures, which authorities believe were caused by blows from a blackjack.

Although long considered a suspect in his wife’s death, John Dawson, was not arrested until April 21, 2009, about one month after Dawson’s nephew, Duane Schmidt, came forward to state police and told authorities to say he overheard Dawson discussing the murder with a friend.

Schmidt, 56, said that Dawson smelled of smoke and gasoline and had burn marks on his hands the morning after the killing, police said.

Schmidt, who died of natural causes in August, testified against Dawson during a June 2009 preliminary hearing.

In December, Cascio that Schmidt’s previous testimony can be read into evidence during the trial.

Spangler is expected to argue that Dawson killed his wife of nine years to collect $25,968 in insurance money and to move to Florida with his mistress. The two went to Florida three months after his wife’s murder and opened a bar in Jacksonville.

Dawson denies involvement in his wife’s death.

In addition to criminal homicide, Dawson is charged with arson and conspiracy. He has been held without bond in the county jail since his arrest.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.