ShareThis Page
Jury acquits Duquesne woman of Monessen homicide |

Jury acquits Duquesne woman of Monessen homicide

Joe Napsha
| Wednesday, April 2, 2014 3:48 p.m

A Duquesne woman avoided life behind bars on Wednesday when a Westmoreland County jury found her not guilty of the 2012 slaying of a Monessen man, but she could spend up to 20 years in prison for her part in the robbery that ended with the victim’s death.

After more than 14 hours of deliberation, Chalsee Hughes, 21, was found not guilty of second- and third-degree murder and conspiracy to commit homicide.

But jurors found her guilty of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery for buying the bullets that prosecutors said were used by three men to kill Chris “Snaxx” Fincik, 36, in his home on Dec. 2, 2012.

Hughes cried when the jury foreman read the verdict acquitting her of the murder charges, and she continued to cry as she learned she was found guilty of the robbery and conspiracy charges.

She smiled to about a half-dozen friends inside Judge Al Bell’s courtroom as she was removed by sheriff’s deputies to be returned to the county jail, where she has been held the past 15 months. Bell denied defense attorney Tim Andrews’ request that bond be set.

Bell said he will sentence Hughes within 90 days, after a pre-sentence investigation is complete.

Fincik’s mother, Michele Fincik of Charleroi, expressed disappointment with the split verdict.

“I’ve lost a son. His daughter lost a father, and everybody gets to go home,” Fincik said outside the courthouse.

Hughes’ mother, Tiffany Hughes of Duquesne, remained outside the courtroom when the verdict was read. As people filed into the room to learn of Hughes’ fate, her mother was praying.

“We said a prayer. A mother’s prayer is the best,” Tiffany Hughes said, adding that her “prayers go out to the Fincik family. My daughter never, ever had any intention to do anything that she was charged with.

“I hope justice comes to the people who did this,” Tiffany Hughes said.

Andrews said he was pleased with the verdict and he felt that justice was served because Chalsee Hughes was not involved in the homicide.

District Attorney John Peck said he believed the case was made for a second-degree murder conviction, but the jury might have been reluctant to convict the young woman on a murder charge that would have sent her to prison for life. Peck said he was thankful for the jury convicting Hughes on the robbery charges.

Fincik, 36, was shot to death when four bullets were fired through the closed door of his home during an attempted robbery by three masked men.

The suspected shooter, Earl Pinkney, 20, of Monessen, is in jail and faces a pretrial conference scheduled for April 24 before Bell. Pinkney was Hughes’ boyfriend at the time of the shooting.

Prosecutors said two other Monessen men — Josh Stepoli, 21, and Antoine Hairston, 19 — went to the house with Pinkney, but they have not been charged in connection with the killing.

Fincik, who had a record for drug convictions, had heroin, cocaine and more than $3,100 in his home, police said.

Police said Hughes was seen in a videotape with two men at a Wal-Mart store in Rostraver, displaying identification to purchase a box of ammunition. Three hours after the bullets were purchased, Peck told jurors, bullets from that box of ammunition were used to kill Fincik.

Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.