Jury awards Shaler man $3.75 million for land seized by PennDOT |

Jury awards Shaler man $3.75 million for land seized by PennDOT

An Allegheny County jury this week awarded a Shaler man $3.75 million for the former Millvale Industrial Park site that was taken through eminent domain as part of the Route 28 expansion.

PennDOT offered Andrew Lang, 67, $2 million for his property that bordered Route 28. Lang thought his property was worth $12 million. He filed suit against PennDOT, and a jury issued the award on Wednesday, according to his attorney, Maurice Nernberg.

“We’re satisfied with the amount, but I can’t say we’re ruling out an appeal,” Nernberg said. “(PennDOT) never offered him enough money. There’s not a whole lot of negotiation with PennDOT.”

PennDOT spokesman Steve Chizmar declined to comment.

PennDOT took the property, located between the 31st Street and 40th Street bridges, in 2009. It later paid Lang $2 million. The ruling means the agency will owe Lang $1.75 million plus interest, Nernberg said.

Lang has owned the property since 1971 and leased space to businesses.

“He bought this property in his 20s. He built it up and got it occupied,” Nernberg said.

Lang’s lawsuit was not the only litigation the Route 28 project has sparked.

Sheriff’s deputies forced William Lieberth Sr., 57, of West Deer out of his business, Allegheny Auto Body, in October after he fought a lengthy battle with the state and lost in that eminent domain seizure.

Lieberth’s eviction last fall removed the final roadblock in a $120 million project by PennDOT to remake Route 28 as a four-lane, limited-access highway with no traffic signals between Pittsburgh and Kittanning. The route channels 60,000 motorists daily through the North Side.

The project required PennDOT to buy all or part of 166 properties and relocate at least 15 residents and 24 businesses. It is scheduled to be completed in late 2014.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.