ShareThis Page
Jury delivers swift verdict in Fayette murder |

Jury delivers swift verdict in Fayette murder

| Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:00 a.m

A Fayette County jury on Thursday rejected a claim of self-defense and handed down a first-degree murder conviction against Torey V. Peterson, 23, of Allison, Redstone Township, in the January death of a Greene County man.

After just two days of testimony, the jury took less than three hours to reach its verdict and convict Peterson in the Jan. 11 shooting death of William F. Mason, of Jefferson.

The jury of six men and six women rejected the defense claim that Peterson was simply protecting himself from a stranger when he shot Mason once in the head in an apartment in the Hunter’s Ridge public housing project in Redstone Township.

During the trial, Assistant Public Defender David Kaiser attempted to show that it was Mason who initiated the confrontation that led to his death when he barged into the apartment that was occupied by Peterson and several others.

The prosecution, led by District Attorney Nancy Vernon, claimed throughout the trial that Peterson intended to kill Mason, and then, after the shooting, tried to get rid of the gun and the spent shell casing.

Immediately after the verdict was announced, Fayette County Judge Gerald Solomon instructed the jury that the death sentence was not an option in the case because there were no aggravating circumstances.

Solomon then directed the jury to deliberate once more and return with a sentence of life in prison, an action that took the jury just a few minutes.

From the time the verdict was first read, Peterson sat with his head down on the defense table, not raising it even when the judge imposed the life sentence, which is to be served in a state correctional facility.

After the sentencing, Peterson was led from the courtroom in handcuffs. He made no comment, nor did he acknowledge the presence of about a half-dozen family members.

Peterson’s mother, Tonya Groomes, was clearly upset with the verdict.

“This is a prejudiced jury in ‘Fayette-nam,'” Groomes said outside the courtroom. “The system is corrupt all the way from the township police to the Fayette courthouse.”

While Kaiser said he plans to appeal the conviction, both Vernon and Mason’s family indicated they were satisfied with the jury’s decision.

“The commonwealth is pleased with the verdict,” Vernon said. “It was a tough decision for the jury to make. There was a lot of evidence for them to review.”

Mason’s mother, Dolores Mason, said, “I’m just happy we got justice for Billy.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.