ShareThis Page
Justice for Joe Paterno |

Justice for Joe Paterno

In a rush to judgment, Gov. Tom Corbett and the board of trustees from Penn State University launched their campaign to have Coach Joe Paterno fired.

The real perpetrator of the crimes was Jerry Sandusky. However, you wouldn’t think that listening to the arguments against Paterno.

Now, long after the fact and the death of Coach Paterno, Gov. Corbett has conceded that the coach should not have been fired.

Joe Paterno went to his grave believing he was a failure because the university he loved, the “Happy Valley” he helped put on the map, shunned and betrayed him in his final days.

Paterno reported the (then) allegations against Sandusky to his superiors. Ultimately, Jerry Sandusky was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to prison.

The abused children may take a lifetime to recover from the atrocities perpetrated against them. They can take some consolation that Sandusky will never again be a free man. Justice was served.

Perhaps Corbett can now launch a vigorous campaign to undo the damage to Paterno.

Paterno should have his good name restored and Corbett should encourage the NCAA to reinstate the coach’s entire collegiate record.

Remember, the real criminal is behind bars.

Richard R. Ferrero Sr.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.