Kathleen Kane's enforcer |

Kathleen Kane's enforcer


Paranoia runs deep at the top levels of the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, starting in the front office. And it's become increasingly clear why AG Kathleen Kane chose Jonathan Duecker, the head of the narcotics unit, to become her “acting” chief of staff though he still carries a badge: Duecker, whom Kane promoted in April despite two outstanding sexual harassment complaints, is “The Enforcer.”

Any perceived disloyalty against Kane is tracked down by Duecker, whose background is counterintelligence. Mole hunts are launched, sources say, as if they are conducted by Cold War espionage agents. To blame the human carnage of firings on Duecker would be wrong; he was promoted because of his unwavering loyalty to Kane. Ultimately, she is signing off on or initiating the firings and she was doing it long before he took over.

Last week, Kane fired George Moore, an official who worked in Human Resources. Moore recommended to Kane that Duecker be fired for the two sexual harassment complaints. That occurred after Duecker was promoted. Several days before his promotion, the agency's internal affairs unit sent Kane the allegations. I don't know whether Duecker did what's alleged. But why would he be promoted without resolving the matter?

Morale is in the tank as a criminal investigation of Kane by the Montgomery County district attorney intensifies. A second round of search warrants was served on the AG's offices recently by DA Risa Ferman. She is deciding whether Kane should be charged with crimes for allegedly leaking grand jury material, perjuring herself before a grand jury and trying to cover it up. A statewide grand jury recommended she be charged. The next step is up to Ferman, a Republican running for judge. A statewide grand jury judge referred the case to her.

Kane's office clearly is in disarray, even a former Kane supporter says. It's become a resume mill for departing staffers. Firings are so commonplace they are hard to track.

A long line of once-loyal employees has been ousted. Moore, as were others, was escorted to the door by armed agents.

Duecker, who drives a Mercedes-Benz seized from drug dealers as his state car, is both chief of staff and an agent. That baffles some insiders on why he'd have authority over prosecutors. Kane's spokesman Chuck Ardo told me she wanted it this way.

If you didn't know that countless employees still are doing stellar work, you'd wonder how the office is functioning at all. But how much time is spent on Kane loyalty tests and internal investigations rather than important criminal and civil cases?

Why does Kane think she can fire staffers, like James Barker, who were grand jury witnesses and under protective order from the court? What other public officials in Pennsylvania could survive promoting a guy accused of sexual harassment? When will it end?

Brad Bumsted is the Trib's state Capitol reporter (717-787-1405 or [email protected]).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.