ShareThis Page
Kelly to be Corbett’s pick for attorney general |

Kelly to be Corbett’s pick for attorney general

HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Corbett today nominated Linda Kelly, a career federal prosecutor, to be state attorney general, a post Corbett held until he took the oath of office as governor Jan. 18.

If confirmed by the state Senate, Kelly would be the first woman in modern history to serve as the state’s chief law enforcement officer.

Kelly, 61, of Edgewood worked for Corbett as a federal prosecutor in Pittsburgh. Corbett was U.S. attorney from 1989-1993. Kelly was his first assistant and she also worked with Corbett as an assistant district attorney in Allegheny County.

“It will be a new and challenging role,” said Kelly, a Republican. “I am honored and humbled by Gov. Corbett’s nomination.”

“She has consistently demonstrated good judgment and commonsense,” Corbett said. He said it was a “unique situation” for a governor to be able to appoint his successor as attorney general.

Corbett, a Shaler Republican, will ask the GOP-controlled Senate to confirm her. Nominees for this office require a two-thirds, rather than simple majority vote, which is used for Cabinet officers.

Kelly said if confirmed she will not seek election to the seat.

Kelly served as acting U.S. attorney in Pittsburgh from 1998 through 2001 and again in 2001. She would hold the seat through 2012.

Corbett was elected attorney general in 2004 and re-elected in 2008. He was elected governor last November.

When asked what areas of law or service she might focus on as attorney general, Kelly said that would be premature before she’s had time to learn about the office and until she’s confirmed.

Kellly will remain in the U.S. attorney’s office until the Senate acts on her nomination.

Corbett said in the interim Kelly can be briefed about civil matters pending in the attorney general’s office, but not criminal cases.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.