ShareThis Page
Kevin Gorman: Evaluate Chris Archer’s impact on Pirates after 3 years, not 3 weeks |

Kevin Gorman: Evaluate Chris Archer’s impact on Pirates after 3 years, not 3 weeks

Getty Images
MINNEAPOLIS, MN - AUGUST 15: Chris Archer #24 of the Pittsburgh Pirates delivers a pitch against the Minnesota Twins during the first inning of the interleague game on August 15, 2018 at Target Field in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Photo by Hannah Foslien/Getty Images)

Chris Archer can’t help but pay attention to Tyler Glasnow and the Tampa Bay Rays, and not just because Glasnow is the centerpiece of the package involved in Archer’s trade to the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Archer still follows his former team, so he’s as aware as anyone of how Glasnow performed in his first four starts with the Rays — which is to say better than Archer did in his first three with the Pirates.

Where Glasnow has allowed eight runs (seven earned) on nine hits, with 24 strikeouts and six walks in 18 2 3 innings for Tampa, Archer has allowed 11 runs (nine earned) on 18 hits, with 16 strikeouts and six walks in 14 1 3 innings for the Pirates.

“To me, there’s no reason to compare,” said Archer, who will make his fourth start for the Pirates on Monday night against the Atlanta Braves.

“He’s very early in his career, and his ceiling is as high as anybody’s. I’ve already established myself. It’s hard to compare somebody who’s in their rookie season to somebody who’s in their sixth or seventh season.”

Complicating matters is that the Pirates are 7-10 since acquiring Archer and reliever Keone Kela before the nonwaiver trade deadline, and that’s thanks to Adam Frazier’s solo shot in the 11th inning for a 2-1 walk-off win over the Chicago Cubs on Sunday afternoon at PNC Park.

For Pirates fans who are worrying about buyer’s remorse, especially after 2017 first-rounder Shane Baz was identified last week as the player to be named, consider why the Pirates made this trade in the first place: They chose a proven starting pitcher over a potential ace.

That should be applauded, even if the deal also included promising outfielder Austin Meadows and Archer hasn’t pitched more than five innings in his three starts.

“Haven’t gone deep,” Archer said. “That’s probably been the most frustrating part.”

But this is a trade that should be evaluated after three years, not three weeks.

Archer’s ERA (5.65) is another frustration and enough of an early concern that Pirates general manager Neal Huntington discussed — without provocation — advanced analytics like ERA proxies.

Huntington, however, also pointed to Archer ranking among the game’s top five pitchers in strikeouts (249 in 2017 and 233 in ’16) the past two seasons, noting that they were his “down years.”

“But this is not about these 10 starts that Chris will make for us this year,” Huntington said. “This is about the three-plus years that Chris will make us better, will give us a legitimate top-of-the-rotation type starter.”

The Pirates ran out of patience waiting for Glasnow to become a starter, let alone an ace. The 24-year-old has nasty stuff and posted unbelievable statistics in the minors but bombed as a starter last season and had his struggles in long relief this season.

The Rays got a glimpse of both sides of Glasnow on Saturday in a 5-2 loss to the Boston Red Sox: He had a 28-pitch, four-run first inning, allowing two doubles, two walks and two steals but recovered to retire the final 12 batters and 17 of the last 18 in a career-high 6 2 3 innings.

Archer has left all three Pirates starts with the lead and has a track record of being a workhouse who pitched 201 innings each of the past two seasons. That’s why the Pirates’ young starters applauded the trade. They know they can learn a lot from Archer, a two-time All-Star who pitches with swagger and has lived up to a reputation as a natural leader.

The Pirates are trusting Archer can be that and more for them, something we never could say that with any guarantee about Glasnow.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.