ShareThis Page
Kevin Gorman: It’s a ‘Hard Knocks’ life for Steelers with Le’Veon Bell a no-show |

Kevin Gorman: It’s a ‘Hard Knocks’ life for Steelers with Le’Veon Bell a no-show

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers offensive guard lead blocks for James Conner against the Titans Saturday Aug. 25, 2018 at Heinz Field.
Getty Images
Running back Le'Veon Bell of the Steelers yells to the crowd on the sidelines prior a game against the Chiefs on Oct. 15, 2017, in Kansas City.

Five days before the Pittsburgh Steelers play their season opener, Mike Tomlin said he hadn’t thought about Le’Veon Bell, doesn’t watch Hard Knocks but feels better about James Conner after a lap around the track.

Never mind that the Steelers could start their season at the Cleveland Browns, the subject of HBO’s training-camp special, without the All-Pro running back who was a no-show to practice on Labor Day.

When it came to evading questions surrounding his own reality-show Steelers, Tomlin was in midseason form. Almost as evasive, you could say, as Bell has been in signing his $14.54-million franchise tag tender.

But if you’ve got red paint, you paint your barn red.

That’s a coaching analogy Tomlin shared Tuesday when talking about Todd Haley, the former Steelers offensive coordinator who called Bell’s number 406 times last season but is now calling plays for the Browns.

Tomlin seemed more pleased with the perceived advantage that the NFL has no book on his new offensive coordinator, Randy Fichtner, and less concerned that Haley could share the secrets of the Steelers’ playbook with a Browns coaching staff coming off an 0-16 season.

“You could play that ‘he knows that I know that he knows that I know’ game,” Tomlin said of Haley. “Hopefully, he plays it all week. I’m going to just get ready to play a football game.”

The Steelers appear to be preparing to play without Bell, who hasn’t suited up since an AFC Divisional playoff loss to Jacksonville in January. Bell had 16 carries for 67 yards rushing and nine catches for 88 yards receiving against the Jaguars, becoming the first player in franchise playoff history to score touchdowns by rushing and receiving in the same game. But Bell also came up short on fourth-and-1 toss sweep in the first quarter, a call that had fans howling for Haley’s head.

Tomlin said he hasn’t communicated with Bell this week and is taking a wait-and-see approach to “start quantifying all Le’Veon Bell-related things” until he shows up and signs.

There’s no guarantee that will happen Thursday, not after the L.A. Rams signed Todd Gurley to a four-year, $57.5-million deal that includes a $21 million signing bonus and $45 million guaranteed. If Bell wants to play hardball with the Steelers, he could miss as much as half of the season before he signs.

No wonder the Steelers have put up a united front in standing behind James Conner, the second-year running back from Pitt who rushed for 144 yards on 32 carries in 14 games last season. A year later – or a lap around the track, as Tomlin called it – the Steelers suddenly are singing a different tune about their starting running back.

“Right now, we’re singularly focused on guys that are here and working and have been here and working,” Tomlin said. “We’re building a plan around variables that we know. That’s the appropriate thing.”

Conner earned the respect of and endorsements from his coaches and teammates by showing up in the best shape of his life in the offseason, running with reckless abandon in the preseason and showing improved pass-blocking and pass-catching ability out of the backfield.

Conner just doesn’t do it as well as Bell.

Where Bell has rushed for 1,200 or more yards in three of the past four seasons, Conner has yet to have his first 100-yard game. Where Bell has 35 career rushing touchdowns, including a career-high nine last season, Conner has yet to score his first. Where Bell has 312 receptions for 2,660 yards in five seasons, Conner has yet to record his first NFL catch.

The Steelers beat the Browns in the opener last year despite only a week of practice by Bell, who ran for 32 yards on 10 carries and had three catches for 15 yards. He finished with 1,291 rushing and 655 receiving.

Unlike Tomlin, Bell wasn’t in midseason form until midseason. But Bell was still one of the best running backs in the league, one whose absence leaves the Steelers with a storyline “Hard Knocks” would love.

The Steelers might be circling their wagons around Conner but they know they are better with Bell, no matter how you paint it.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.