ShareThis Page
Keystone Oaks edges past Connellsville |

Keystone Oaks edges past Connellsville

Daily Courier
| Tuesday, December 6, 2011 12:00 a.m

Tim Brown scored two goals and Jacob Miller added a power-play marker, but the Connellsville hockey team was beaten at home by Keystone Oaks, 5-4, on Monday in PIHL Open Division action. Sam Wiatrak added a goal and Johnathan Herchko, Robert Coffman and Ken Robbins each had an assist. Devin Kalp was in goal and made 30 saves for the Falcons (1-7).

Ryan Rosato had three goals, including one short-handed, for Keystone Oaks. John Conley also connected for a short-handed goal and had an assist. Matthew Brestensky scored a goal, and Bryton Tomko and Ryan Ribeau each had two assists. Daniel Smee made 21 saves to get the win in net for Keystone Oaks (3-4).

Men’s basketball

Penn State-Fayette 101, Penn State-York 85 — David Winns scored 23 points and pulled down 10 rebounds, and Ryan Hart collected 13 points and 11 rebounds as the Roaring Lions opened PSUAC play with a victory at home Sunday. Brandon Cunningham scored 21 points, and James Pratt dropped in 18 points for Penn State-Fayette (2-5, 1-0).

Jahmal Ralls led Penn State-York with 25 points and 11 rebounds. Tyler Mitchell and Nick Doolin each scored 11 points, and Joshua Czerski added 10 points.

Women’s basketball

Penn State-Fayette 87, Penn State-York 68 — Jill Guthrie tallied 21 points and 10 rebounds, and Caitlyn Wontroba added 19 points as the Roaring Lions earned a victory at home Sunday in their PSUAC opener. Jennifer Thomas scored 14 points, and Kasey Ruble had 13 points. Kaitlyn Novak added 11 points for Penn State-Fayette (2-3, 1-0).

Hannah Kuhn paced Penn State-York with 29 points and 12 rebounds. Shakayla Mitchell tossed in 28 points and grabbed 19 rebounds.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.