ShareThis Page
Kidnapping suspect from Hazelwood says she suffered miscarriage |

Kidnapping suspect from Hazelwood says she suffered miscarriage

| Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:36 a.m
Yvonne Bradley, of Pittsburgh, is lead out of the Fayette County Booking Center in custody after she had been arrested for kidnapping a 3-month-old infant at Heritage Inn, located along Route 40 in Uniontown, photographed on Tuesday, July 10, 2012. Evan R. Sanders | Tribune-Review
Trooper Stefanie Plume speaks with media regarding the kidnapping of a 3-month-old infant which occurred in an apparent scheme and took place at Heritage Inn along Route 40 in Uniontown on Tuesday, July 10, 2012. Evan R. Sanders | Tribune-Review

A Hazelwood woman accused of kidnapping a 3-month-old boy from a Uniontown motel by telling his mother she represented a diaper manufacturer told police “the opportunity presented itself for me to give my love to another child.”

Yvonne Ican Bradley, 46, cried and shook her head in denial during her arraignment on Tuesday afternoon before she was sent to the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $250,000 bail.

“It made me out to be a monster, and I’m not,” she said after District Judge Michael Metros read the criminal complaint against Bradley, which indicated that she suffered a miscarriage on Friday.

The baby was returned to his mother unharmed, state police Trooper Stefani Plume said.

State troopers and Uniontown police believe the kidnapping was part of a larger scheme involving at least one other person. Plume said the plot developed during the weekend when Bradley contacted the baby’s mother, who lives in Pittsburgh.

Police did not say how the women came in contact with each other.

Others could be arrested, Plume said.

Bradley apparently posed as a representative of Huggies diapers and took the baby and his mother to the Uniontown Wal-Mart on Monday for a meeting with a third woman, Plume said.

“The female said to stay here tonight … until they could do a (photo) shoot today,” she said.

The victim and his mother shared a room with Bradley in the Heritage Inn at routes 40 and 21.

On Tuesday morning,the baby’s mother told police, she walked to a nearby 24-hour Walgreens to get supplies for the child.

The baby and Bradley were gone when the mother returned to the motel, police said.

Police issued a be-on-the-lookout alert about 6 a.m. Tuesday. Shortly after that, an officer spotted Bradley walking with the boy at 55 Morgantown St., not far from the motel.

Employees at the motel declined to comment.

“At this point, it seems as though (Bradley) was going to use the baby as her own,” she said.

Bradley bent over to hide her face as she was escorted out of the police station about 2 p.m., her hands cuffed behind her back.

“I didn’t do anything,” she said. “I just took (the baby) for a walk.”

Bradley told Metros that she is married, has lived in her Johnston Avenue home for eight years and has one child and two stepchildren.

Bradley told police she miscarried about noon Friday and took him to the Homewood Cemetery, according to the criminal complaint.

“I took him out of the toilet and tried to give mouth-to-mouth, and it didn’t work,” she told police.

Bradley told Metros she had been working part-time at a cleaning company and for Kimberly-Clark, the manufacturer of Huggies.

A Kimberly-Clark representative could not be reached on Tuesday.

Bradley wept when the judge ordered her to be held in lieu of $250,000 bail.

“I don’t go around kidnapping people’s children,” she said. “I didn’t do this, I told you the truth.”

She is charged with kidnapping, unlawful restraint, interfering with the custody of a child and endangering the welfare of a child.

Bradley is on state parole for a conviction of theft by deception.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.