ShareThis Page
King wins at Dapper Dan |

King wins at Dapper Dan

| Monday, March 15, 2004 12:00 a.m

Connellsville wrestler Jarrod King was one of three Pennsylvania All-Stars to win his match at Saturday’s Dapper Dan Classic in Pittsburgh. King (160) posted a 3-1 decision over top-ranked Steve Luke of Massillon, Ohio. The United States All-Stars dominated for a 35-9 victory.

In the preliminary match, Southmoreland’s Shane Datz lost a 5-3 overtime decision to Matt Tifflin, but the WPIAL All-Stars defeated the Texas All-Stars 28-17.

PIAA Swimming

Mount Pleasant’s Chelsea Grosser placed 11th in the 500 freestyle with a time of 5:22.71.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.