Kiski Area to boost property tax 1 mill |

Kiski Area to boost property tax 1 mill

Kiski Area School Board approved a preliminary 2001-02 budget Monday that calls for a 1-mill increase in property taxes.

The budget includes $37.7 million in expenses, which is a 2.7 percent increase from the current budget.

Most of the budget – $21.6 million – is earmarked for instructional purposes. That figure reflects 57 percent of the budget.

Board members voted 8-0 to approve the budget. President Stephen Nelson was absent.

Most of Kiski Area is in Westmoreland County, but part of it – Parks Township – is in Armstrong County, which is why two different tax rates apply.

In Westmoreland, the tax rate will go up 1 mill to 57.7 mills. In Armstrong, the tax rate will go up 1 mill to 28.7 mills.

For Kiski Area, 1 mill generates about $190,000, business manager Kevin Palladino said.

The tax increase is needed because costs in the district are increasing, Palladino said.

On the revenue side, the district expects to get $15.6 million in money from local taxes, which is a 4 percent increase over the current budget. The district expects to get $17.8 million from state sources, which is a 2 percent increase.

Federal and other sources of revenue will make up the difference between expenses and revenue.

Superintendent Stephen Vak said the district’s tax rate is about average for school districts in Westmoreland County and probably one of the lowest in Armstrong.

Copies of the preliminary budget will be available to the public and will be placed in all schools, banks and municipal offices within the district, Vak said.

Board members plan to adopt a final 2001-02 budget at their June meeting.

In other business, board members also accepted the resignations of Milt Shearer and LuAnn Fee. Shearer, the district’s athletics director, served the district 36 years and Fee, the district’s food service director, served the district four years.

Jonathan Szish can be reached at [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.