ShareThis Page
Kittanning’s Colligan set for finals |

Kittanning’s Colligan set for finals

Dan Stefano
| Monday, October 6, 2008 12:00 a.m

As her junior season draws to a close, Kittanning golfer Ann Colligan is in a familiar position — the WPIAL finals.

When Colligan tees off at 10:40 a.m. today at Valley Brook Country Club in McMurray, it will mark the third time she’s taken part in the finals in her high school career.

In her freshman year of 2006, she narrowly missed the cut in the finals to advance to the PIAA Western Regional. In 2007, she tied for eighth place at the WPIALs and made it to the Western Regional, where her season ended.

“I definitely want to make it back to states,” Colligan said. “That’s my initial goal; and if I make it to states, I want to do better than last year.”

Colligan’s previous experiences at the WPIAL finals may help give her an advantage in accomplishing those goals.

“The most important thing I learned is I’m going to be nervous, but so is everyone else,” Colligan said. “It’s just about how you adapt to the nervousness.”

If anything unnerves her, it may be that she shot a season-low 45 on Thursday at Fox Chapel in her final outing before the finals.

“It was a bit frustrating,” Colligan said. “It wasn’t exactly what I wanted to shoot going in WPIALs, but it wasn’t terrible the entire way. It was two holes that killed me, and two holes can do a lot of damage.”

Last week wasn’t all bad for Colligan. She also shot a season-low 35 on Tuesday at her home course — Kittanning Country Club. In July, at the same course, she had an ace on the 17th hole.

On top of her previous accomplishments and current plans, Colligan has an eye on the future, too.

“My ultimate goal is to get a college scholarship somewhere,” she said. “That’s going to be a goal going into my senior year.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.