ShareThis Page
Knight silences critics with play vs. Rhode Island |

Knight silences critics with play vs. Rhode Island

| Monday, December 23, 2002 12:00 a.m

Brandin Knight heard the catcalls from Rhode Island fans who questioned the Pitt point guard’s credentials, from his All-American status to the Panthers’ national ranking to his standing in the family hierarchy.

They didn’t just tell Knight he was overrated. They told him he wasn’t as good as his brother Brevin, the former Standford star and current Memphis Grizzlies backup point guard. They mocked his name and his game.

By game’s end, Knight had them clammed up.

Knight couldn’t help but crack a slight smile after scoring a season-high 22 points in Pitt’s 87-71 victory Saturday night before a sellout crowd of 8,121 at Rhode Island’s new $54 million Ryan Center.

“Everywhere we go is pretty much a hostile environment,” Knight said. “We’re targeted on everyone’s list, naturally, because we’re ranked so high. I get to hear the chants — ‘Brevin’s better. Or your brother sucks.’ All that stuff just helps me. I just take it in stride.

“Of course, he’s better. That’s why he’s in the NBA.”

Knight showed signs that he has recovered from offseason arthroscopic surgery against Ohio State on Wednesday, when he had 17 points, four rebounds and six assists in 34 minutes in the 69-49 win. He followed that with his most dominating offensive performance of the season against Rhode Island.

Knight was at his best against the Rams, doubling his season scoring average. He came in averaging 29.9 minutes per game; against Rhode Island, he logged 38. Knight came in shooting 39 percent from the field and 28 percent from 3-point range; against Rhode Island, he was 7 of 14 from the field, including 5 of 9 from behind the arc.

“I got some open looks,” Knight said. “Our guys did a great job setting screens in our half-court man-to-man offense. The opportunities were there. Early in the season, I hadn’t been capitalizing on them.

“(Saturday), everything felt like it was good when I was shooting.”

Knight, a 6-foot senior, drew rave reviews from the Rams. He was the key to Pitt’s offense. When guarded closely, he penetrated and dished passes to open players. When given a cushion, Knight drained long 3-pointers.

“He’s real calm on the court,” Rhode Island shooting guard Dustin Hellenga said. “He doesn’t make too many mistakes. He gets his teammates involved. He’s a helluva point guard.”

Knight also held Rhode Island point guard Howard Smith in check. Smith was 0 for 6 from the field and finished with two points, six assists and four turnovers in 21 minutes. Knight, by contrast, had five rebounds, four assists, four steals and four turnovers while sitting out only two minutes.

Despite being Pitt’s leading scorer, Knight is on pace to finish his career as its all-time assists leader. He has 52 in eight games this season, and his 622 career assists rank second behind Sean Miller (744, 1987-92).

If Knight didn’t come to Rhode Island with respect, he certainly left with it.

“He’s such a level-headed point guard,” Rhode Island coach Jim Baron said. “He just gets the ball to the right people and doesn’t lose his cool.”

Especially not over how he is rated.

Brandin’s back

Pitt All-America point guard Brandin Knight had his best game of the season — scoring-wise — in the Panthers’ 87-71 victory at Rhode Island on Saturday. Here is a game-by-game look at his season statistics:

Opponent Pts Rebs Assts Steals
Duquesne 13 4 4 2
St. Francis 10 8 9 4
Ark.-Pine Bluff 11 2 8 2
Norfolk St. 9 2 6 1
Penn State 7 4 4 4
S.E. La. 13 5 9 1
Ohio State 17 4 6 1
Rhode Island 22 5 4 3
Totals 102 34 50 18

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.