ShareThis Page
LaBar: WrestleMania 31 one of the best ever |

LaBar: WrestleMania 31 one of the best ever

| Monday, March 30, 2015 7:12 a.m
AP Images for WWE
WWE Superstar Seth Rollins celebrates becoming the new WWE World Heavyweight Champion at WrestleMania 31 at Levi's Stadium on Sunday, March 29, 2015 in Santa Clara, Cal.
AP Images for WWE
WWE Superstar Daniel Bryan celebrates becoming the new Intercontinental Champion at WrestleMania 31 at Levi's Stadium. on Sunday, March 29, 2015 in Santa Clara, Cal.
AP Images for WWE
Brock Lesnar
AP Images for WWE
WWE superstar John Cena celebrates winning the US title at WrestleMania 31 on Sunday, March 29, 2015.
AP Images for WWE
UFC fighter Ronda Rousey makes a surprise appearance at WrestleMania 31 on Sunday, March 29, 2015.
AP Images for WWE
Dwayne the Rock Johnson stares off against WWE superstar Triple H at WrestleMania 31 on Sunday, March 29, 2015.

The annual big show was littered with questions, controversy and concern about the lack of exciting buildup to certain key matches.

The execution negated all of it.

Brock Lesnar didn’t walk out as world champion. Roman Reigns didn’t walk out as world champion. It was Seth Rollins.

This was a smart decision by WWE to meet in the middle. They’ve put a lot of time into Reigns, but there is no denying there is vocal resistance from the audience to him being the next top guy.

With Rollins cashing in Money in the Bank, which is essentially a license to steal, the table is set for the better situation of Reigns in a traditional babyface chase.

Now, if Reigns doesn’t ultimately beat his former Shield partner for the title, then WWE will have given up on him.

While that ended the show on a high note, I have to address the elephant in the room: The Undertaker.

Folks, I have nothing but respect for the guy. I’m nowhere near brave enough to say it to his face, but The Undertaker needs to stop. Leave them wanting more. Leave a day early versus a day late. The match against Bray Wyatt, at least live with no commentary, was disappointing to watch.

In past years, The Undertaker has showed up each year and performed at a level that stole the show. This performance flat-out didn’t meet the standards previously set.

Congratulations to the mid-card titles, which have instantly been elevated by Daniel Bryan winning the Intercontinental title and John Cena winning the United States title.

The same fans who want the IC title to regain the prestige it once had are the same who support Bryan. The United States title being held by Cena brings so much more exposure to it.

Phenomenal opening ladder match for the IC title. Is Dean Ambrose’s head all right?

I got goosebumps filming Luke Harper walking down the aisle in front of 70,000 people. I worked shows with him as a performer on the independent scene in front of 150 people. This moment for him felt like a small win for all of us.

Finally, hats off to Sting.

I had doubts on what kind of match we would get with him versus Triple H. The two put together something that showcased their strengths. The entire segment and match was dressed up with surprises that made it a WrestleMania classic despite the quality of the Scorpion Death Lock.

The surprise appearances of DX and the New World Order disguised any shortcomings inside the ring with the most basic ingredients of a “This is awesome” recipe.

All in all, it was a great experience for my seventh WrestleMania experience live. I just hope WWE has a better plan moving forward than the Santa Clara had for cabs leaving the stadium.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.